You might have heard about Hong Kong in the news, recently they celebrated twenty years of “return to the motherland”. Before we discuss the HK50 index, it’s let’s briefly review the historical and political situation. You might be asking yourself, is Hong Kong a separate country or part of China? [caption id="attachment_57013" align="alignright" width="450"] Source: https://www.hsi.com.hk/HSI-Net/static/revamp/contents/en/dl_centre/factsheets/FS_HSIe.pdf [/caption] In the strictest sense, Hong Kong is part of China, her official name being Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.
Confusingly, Hong Kong has her own immigration policy, money, stock exchange, postage stamps, flag, etc. This peculiar arrangement is due to the fact that Hong Kong was a British colony from 1841 to 1997. The treaty on “return” stipulated that Hong Kong would continue to operate in a different fashion than most of China, known as “One country, two systems”.
The Hang Seng 50 (HK50 on the GoTrader MT4) has a market capitalization-weighted index of 50 of the largest companies that trade on the Hong Kong Exchange. These companies cover approximately 65% of its total market capitalization. Finance represents almost half of the index.
An additional quarter is weighted in information technology, properties, and telecommunications. As you can see in the weekly view below, HK50 recently broke the 25,000 point mark for the first time in nearly two years. From an all-time high in April 2015, it was last over 25,000 in July 2015.
Continuing a rally from January 2016 which saw the index drop to a five year low. [caption id="attachment_57014" align="alignleft" width="600"] Source: Go Trader MT4 HK50[/caption] Despite the fact that the index’s constituent companies are listed in Hong Kong, 55% of the companies are based in China. A meteoric rise from 5% in 1997, 25% in 2003 and an all-time high of 59% in 2009. HK50 is tied at the hip to the Chinese economy.
How tied is HK50 to mainland Chinese companies you ask? On Tuesday July 4 th shares suffered their worst day in 2017, falling 1.5%, representing the biggest one-day percentage fall since December 15 th. Tencent, one of the ten most valuable companies in the world, headquartered in nearby Shenzhen and making up nearly 11% of the composite.
Tumbled 4% relating to recent negative comments around its popular one-line game products, we should continue to see growth as China's first-quarter GDP growth hit 6.9%, the highest level since the fall. By: Samuel Hertz GO Markets
By
GO Markets
The information provided is of general nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situations or needs. Before acting on any information provided, you should consider whether the information is suitable for you and your personal circumstances and if necessary, seek appropriate professional advice. All opinions, conclusions, forecasts or recommendations are reasonably held at the time of compilation but are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Go Markets Pty Ltd, ABN 85 081 864 039, AFSL 254963 is a CFD issuer, and trading carries significant risks and is not suitable for everyone. You do not own or have any interest in the rights to the underlying assets. You should consider the appropriateness by reviewing our TMD, FSG, PDS and other CFD legal documents to ensure you understand the risks before you invest in CFDs.
Saham pertahanan ASX kembali ke daftar pantauan dan menurut Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), pengeluaran militer global mencapai sekitar US$2,718 triliun pada 2024, naik 9,4% secara riil.
Pengaturan pertahanan Australia saat ini ditetapkan dalam Strategi Pertahanan Nasional 2024 dan dokumen perencanaan investasi terkait, yang menguraikan prioritas pendanaan kemampuan jangka panjang. Selain itu, Canberra telah menunjuk investasi kemampuan A$330 miliar hingga 2034, termasuk dana tambahan untuk kombatan permukaan, kesiapsiagaan, serangan jarak jauh dan sistem otonom.
Inilah bagian yang kebanyakan orang lewatkan: tidak semua saham pertahanan ASX adalah perdagangan yang sama. Beberapa duduk dekat dengan pembuatan kapal angkatan laut. Beberapa adalah nama kontra-drone dan beberapa adalah operator yang lebih kecil dan berisiko lebih tinggi di mana satu kontrak mungkin jauh lebih penting daripada yang diasumsikan pasar.
Kelima nama ini bukan daftar beli, melainkan daftar pantauan praktis bagi investor yang mencoba memahami di mana momentum pengadaan sebenarnya muncul di ASX.
1) Australia (ASX: ASB)
Austal adalah salah satu perusahaan yang terdaftar di ASX yang paling langsung terkena pipa pembuatan kapal angkatan laut Australia, meskipun pelaksanaan kontrak, margin, dan waktu pengiriman tetap menjadi variabel penting.
Mereka tidak hanya memenangkan kontrak acak; mereka telah menandatangani perjanjian hukum besar-besaran (Perjanjian Pembuatan Kapal Strategis) yang menjadikan mereka mitra resmi untuk membangun generasi berikutnya kapal militer menengah Australia di Australia Barat.
Pada Februari 2026, pemerintah memberi Austal lampu hijau pada proyek senilai $4 miliar. Ini bukan hanya untuk satu kapal, ini untuk 8 kapal “Landing Craft Heavy”. Ini adalah kapal pengangkut besar (panjang sekitar 100 meter) yang dirancang untuk membawa tank berat dan peralatan langsung ke pantai. Tapi inilah bagian yang kebanyakan orang lewatkan, pembuatan kapal adalah maraton, bukan sprint.
Seperti yang Anda lihat di garis waktu pengiriman, sementara konstruksi dimulai pada tahun 2026, kapal terakhir tidak akan dikirim sampai 2038. Bagi seorang investor, ini berarti Austal memiliki aliran pendapatan “terjamin” selama 12 tahun ke depan, tetapi mereka harus sangat pandai mengelola biaya mereka selama periode yang lama untuk benar-benar menghasilkan keuntungan.
2) DroneShield (ASX: DRO)
Jika Anda telah melihat rekaman drone kecil yang mengganggu medan perang modern, DroneShield sedang membangun bagian dari “sakelar mati”. Fokusnya adalah teknologi kontra-drone, termasuk sistem yang mendeteksi, mengganggu atau mengalahkan drone menggunakan perang elektronik, sensor, dan alat yang dipimpin perangkat lunak, daripada hanya mengandalkan amunisi tradisional.
Pada awal 2026, DroneShield telah bergerak melampaui label start-up yang menjanjikan dan ke fase komersial yang jauh lebih besar. Ini melaporkan pendapatan FY2025 sebesar A $216.5 juta, naik 276% dari FY2024, dan mengatakan memulai FY2026 dengan pendapatan berkomitmen A $103.5 juta.
Satu hal yang mungkin diabaikan pasar adalah lapisan perangkat lunak dalam model. DroneShield melaporkan pendapatan Software as a Service (SaaS) sebesar A$11.6 juta pada FY2025 dan mengatakan sedang bekerja menuju SaaS yang menghasilkan 30% dari pendapatan dalam lima tahun. Model berlangganannya mencakup pembaruan perangkat lunak untuk sistem yang digunakan, yang menambahkan aliran pendapatan berulang yang berkembang di samping penjualan perangkat keras.
Di antara saham pertahanan ASX, DroneShield adalah salah satu cara paling langsung untuk mengikuti tema Counter-UAS. Ini juga salah satu nama di mana sentimen dapat berayun dengan cepat, karena cerita pertumbuhan dapat berubah kembali ke atas dan ke bawah ketika waktu pesanan berubah.
EOS membangun “otak” dan “otot” untuk platform militer. Hal ini terkenal karena sistem senjata jarak jauh, yang memungkinkan operator untuk mengontrol menara bersenjata dari dalam kendaraan yang dilindungi, dan untuk sistem laser berenergi tinggi yang ditujukan untuk pertahanan kontra-drone. EOS mengatakan backlog tanpa syarat mencapai sekitar A$459,1 juta pada awal 2026, menyusul serangkaian kemenangan kontrak hingga 2025. Itu menunjukkan basis pekerjaan yang aman yang jauh lebih besar, meskipun waktu pengiriman dan konversi pendapatan masih penting.
EOS menandatangani kontrak senilai €71,4 juta, sekitar A$125 juta, dengan pelanggan Eropa untuk sistem senjata laser energi tinggi 100 kilowatt. EOS mengatakan sistem ini dirancang untuk biaya rendah per bidikan dan dapat melibatkan hingga 20 drone per menit. Pemerintah Australia telah menyisihkan 1,3 miliar dolar Australia selama 10 tahun untuk akuisisi kemampuan kontra-drone, dan EOS telah mengungkapkan bahwa mereka adalah bagian dari tim tawaran LAND 156 yang sukses. Itu tidak menjamin pendapatan di masa depan, tetapi mendukung visibilitas jangka menengah di pasar yang sudah ditargetkan perusahaan.
EOS dibaca sebagai cerita rebound, tetapi yang masih bergantung pada eksekusi. Perusahaan telah berorientasi ulang di sekitar sistem senjata jarak jauh, sistem kontra-drone dan laser, semua area terkait dengan pengeluaran pertahanan yang lebih kuat. Pertanyaan kuncinya adalah apakah ia dapat terus mengubah backlog dan pipeline menjadi pendapatan yang disampaikan sambil mempertahankan disiplin neraca.
4) Kode (ASX: CDA)
Codan terkadang ditinggalkan dari daftar saham pertahanan biasa karena lebih beragam. Itu mungkin kekeliruan. Dalam hasil H1 FY26, Codan mengatakan bisnis Komunikasi merancang komunikasi penting untuk pasar keamanan militer dan publik global. Pendapatan komunikasi naik 19% menjadi A $221,8 juta. Perusahaan juga mengatakan DTC menghasilkan pertumbuhan yang kuat dari permintaan pertahanan dan sistem tak berawak, dengan pendapatan sistem tak berawak naik 68% menjadi A$73 juta. Codan mengatakan sekitar setengah dari pendapatan tak berawak itu terkait dengan aplikasi pertahanan operasional di zona konflik.
Di sinilah cerita menjadi lebih bernuansa. Dalam sekeranjang saham pertahanan ASX, Codan dapat menawarkan profil yang berbeda, dengan sensitivitas judul yang kurang murni, diversifikasi operasi yang lebih luas dan paparan yang berarti terhadap komunikasi militer dan sistem tak berawak tanpa menjadi nama tema tunggal. Diversifikasi itu juga dapat berarti saham tidak selalu diperdagangkan seperti nama pertahanan murni.
HighCom berada di akhir spekulatif daftar ini, dan harus diberi label seperti itu. Perusahaan mengatakan dua bisnisnya yang berkelanjutan adalah HighCom Armor, yang memasok perlindungan balistik, dan HighCom Technology, yang memasok dan memelihara sistem udara kecil dan menengah tanpa awak, sistem udara tanpa awak, dan rekayasa terkait, integrasi, pemeliharaan dan dukungan logistik untuk ADF dan militer regional yang selaras lainnya.
Di H1 FY26, pendapatan dari operasi berkelanjutan turun 59% menjadi A $10,9 juta, sementara EBITDA bergerak ke kerugian A $5.4 juta dari laba A$1.9 juta tahun sebelumnya. HighCom juga mengungkapkan pendapatan A$5,1 juta dalam HighCom Technology, termasuk A$3,5 juta dari suku cadang sistem udara kecil tanpa awak (SUAS) dan A $1,6 juta dari layanan keberlanjutan yang diberikan kepada Departemen Pertahanan Australia.
Jadi ya, HighCom adalah salah satu saham pertahanan ASX yang lebih sensitif secara finansial di dewan direksi. Tapi itu juga jenis nama yang lebih kecil yang dapat menunjukkan bagaimana pengadaan menyaring ke dalam peralatan pendukung, keberlanjutan, dan perlindungan spesialis.
Pengamatan pasar utama
Lacak tonggak program, bukan hanya berita utama politik. Penghargaan kontrak, produksi dimulai, jadwal pengiriman, dan pekerjaan pemeliharaan sering kali lebih penting dari satu hari pengumuman.
Pisahkan eksposur permainan murni dari eksposur yang beragam. DroneShield dan EOS lebih dekat dengan tema teknologi pertahanan terkonsentrasi, sementara Codan membawa paparan komunikasi dalam bauran bisnis yang lebih luas.
Tonton tema kemampuan kedaulatan di Australia. Austal dan EOS terkait dengan manufaktur lokal, integrasi, dan rantai pasokan Australia, yang mendukung tema kemampuan kedaulatan yang lebih luas dalam grup ini.
Perhatikan neraca dan konversi tunai. Momentum pengadaan bisa menjadi nyata bahkan ketika waktu menjadi berantakan. Setengah terakhir HighCom adalah pengingat akan hal itu.
Berita utama pertahanan bisa terlihat langsung. Penghasilan biasanya tidak. Pekerjaan angkatan laut utama Austal membentang hingga dekade berikutnya. Kontrak EOS dikirimkan selama beberapa tahun. Aliran pesanan DroneShield tampak kuat, tetapi perusahaan masih memisahkan pendapatan berkomitmen dari peluang pipeline yang lebih luas. HighCom menunjukkan sisi lain dari koin. Paparan pengadaan tidak secara otomatis diterjemahkan ke dalam eksekusi keuangan yang lancar.
Referensi ke saham pertahanan yang terdaftar di ASX hanya informasi umum, bukan rekomendasi untuk membeli, menjual, atau memegang sekuritas atau CFD apa pun. Saham-saham ini bisa sangat fluktuatif dan sensitif terhadap waktu kontrak, kebijakan pemerintah, geopolitik, risiko eksekusi, dan kondisi pasar. Backlog, pipeline, dan ekspektasi pendapatan bukanlah jaminan kinerja masa depan.
Siap untuk berdagang di luar mata uang utama? Buka akun · Masuk
Pada tanggal 28 Februari 2026, ketika serangan gabungan AS dan Israel dimulai, angka-angka di layar mulai bergerak dengan cara yang terasa klinis, bahkan ketika kenyataan di lapangan dengan kematian tragis korban sipil di Iran, terasa sama sekali tidak. Pasar, seperti yang mereka katakan, tidak memiliki kompas moral, melainkan mereka memiliki mesin penimbang dan saat ini, mereka menimbang transisi seluruh ekonomi global dari model “just-in-time” ke siklus “just-in-case”.
Pasar apa yang memberi sinyal
Pada 2 Maret, rekaman indeks tetap berhati-hati sementara pertahanan naik. Secara historis, konflik dapat mempercepat pengisian ulang dan pesanan tetapi seberapa besar (dan seberapa cepat) masih tergantung pada anggaran, persetujuan, dan hambatan pengiriman.
Para Pemenang
1. Hanwha Aerospace (012450.KS)
Hanwha adalah salah satu nama yang lebih aktif diperdagangkan terkait dengan tema “K-Defence”, pasar perusahaan yang semakin dipandang sebagai pemasok yang dapat diskalakan ke dalam siklus artileri dan amunisi global yang ketat. Kapasitas dan kredibilitas pengiriman.
Ketika pengisian menjadi mendesak, kemampuan untuk memproduksi dalam skala sering kali sama pentingnya dengan platform itu sendiri. Permintaan ekspor yang terkait dengan sistem seperti K9 Thunder dan Chunmoo telah memperkuat narasi aliran pesanan yang tahan lama bahkan ketika hasilnya masih bergantung pada anggaran, persetujuan, dan jadwal pengiriman.
Hal-hal penting yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: pembaruan buku pesanan, irama produksi, dan pengumuman ekspor lanjutan.
2. Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Northrop beralih ke fokus karena investor meninjau kembali eksposur terhadap modernisasi strategis dan program besar yang berjalan lama. Pasar pertahanan yang sering dilihat sebagai misi kritis dapat bertahan di seluruh siklus. Ini kurang sekitar seperempat dan lebih tentang apakah momentum tetap stabil jika prioritas modernisasi tetap ada (dan apakah garis waktu bergeser jika tidak).
Variabel kunci yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: Kecepatan pengadaan, waktu kontrak, dan bahasa pendanaan terkait program.
3. Perusahaan RTX (RTX)
RTX kembali ke pusat rekaman saat investor memberi harga siklus pengisian pencegat dan ekonomi pertahanan udara tempo tinggi. Penggeseran mahal dan ketika tingkat penggunaan meningkat, pemerintah biasanya harus mengisi kembali persediaan dan, dalam banyak kasus, mendanai ekspansi produksi yang dapat memperpanjang backlog dan meningkatkan visibilitas pendapatan.
Variabel kunci yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: Pesanan pengisian ulang, indikator ekspansi manufaktur, dan throughput pengiriman.
4. Lockheed Martin (LMT)
Lockheed menarik perhatian ketika pasar berfokus pada permintaan pertahanan rudal dan pertanyaan yang dihadapi setiap meja pengadaan dalam lingkungan tempo tinggi: seberapa cepat inventaris dapat dibangun kembali? Jika pemanfaatan tetap tinggi, pemenang cenderung menjadi kontraktor yang paling tepat untuk meningkatkan produksi dan memberikan yang andal. Paparan pertahanan rudal Lockheed membuatnya tetap terkait erat dengan narasi pengisian ulang itu.
Variabel kunci yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: sinyal ramp produksi, ekonomi unit, dan irama pesanan yang digerakkan oleh anggaran.
5. Sistem BAE (BAL)
Dengan backlog £83,6 miliar dan peran sentral dalam program kapal selam AUKUS, BAE beralih ke fokus karena bagian Eropa menandakan ambisi belanja pertahanan yang lebih tinggi. Saham naik 6,11% ke level tertinggi 52 minggu di tengah rotasi “risk-off”, dengan pedagang mengamati tonggak sejarah AUKUS dan pengadaan pertahanan udara dan rudal Eropa, termasuk “Sky Shield”.
Variabel kunci yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: Katalis potensial adalah peningkatan yang jelas dalam pengeluaran Jerman yang mengangkat aliran pesanan di seluruh unit BAE Eropa, sementara risiko utama termasuk lonjakan tajam dalam imbal hasil emas Inggris, volatilitas pound sterling yang diperbarui, atau pengambilan keuntungan “ancaman perdamaian”.
800
The Losers: tidak setiap 'saham perang' naik
6. AeroVironment (AVAV)
AeroVironment melonjak 18% pada pembukaan sebelum jatuh 17% intraday setelah laporan bahwa Angkatan Luar Angkasa AS membuka kembali kontrak senilai US$1,4 miliar. Langkah ini menyoroti bagaimana proses pengadaan dan risiko kontrak dapat mendorong volatilitas, bahkan dalam lingkungan tematik yang mendukung.
7. Pertahanan Kratos (KTOS)
Kratos duduk di tema drone dan amunisi yang berkeliaran yang menarik perhatian saat konflik Timur Tengah meningkat. Saham masih terjual setelah pendapatan, menyoroti risiko sektor pertahanan umum. Kratos mengumumkan penawaran ekuitas lanjutan besar dalam kisaran US$1,2 miliar hingga US$1,4 miliar, langkah ini memperkuat neraca dan dapat mendukung investasi program masa depan.
Untuk pedagang yang berfokus pada narasi “premium konflik” jangka pendek, pengenceran dapat dengan cepat mengubah pengaturan. Bahkan ketika kondisi permintaan tampak mendukung, pasar dapat harga kembali saham jika setiap pemegang saham pada akhirnya memiliki porsi bisnis yang lebih kecil.
8. Mesin Intuitif (LUNR)
Beberapa nama teknologi ruang angkasa spekulatif tertinggal karena investor tampaknya menyukai perusahaan dengan pendapatan terkait pertahanan yang lebih mapan.
9. Boeing (BA)
Boeing turun sekitar 2,5% pada sesi tersebut. Sementara divisi pertahanannya bermakna, bisnis komersialnya bisa lebih sensitif terhadap permintaan penerbangan, gangguan wilayah udara, dan pergerakan harga minyak.
10. Spirit AeroSystems (SPR)
Spirit AeroSystems tetap terkait erat dengan siklus produksi pesawat global sebagai pemasok aerostruktur utama.Hasil terbaru menunjukkan kerugian yang melebar meskipun penjualan lebih tinggi, mencerminkan kenaikan biaya produksi yang sedang berlangsung pada program pesawat utama. Tekanan ini telah membebani kepercayaan investor dalam prospek jangka pendek. Akuisisi yang direncanakan oleh Boeing pada akhirnya dapat membentuk kembali posisi perusahaan dalam rantai pasokan, tetapi risiko eksekusi dan stabilitas produksi tetap menjadi pusat bagaimana harga pasar saham.
Apa yang harus ditonton selanjutnya
Eskalasi vs de-eskalasi: Pergeseran ke arah diplomasi atau diskusi gencatan senjata dapat dengan cepat mengubah sentimen seputar stok pertahanan.
Minyak dan pengiriman: Lonjakan energi dapat memperketat kondisi keuangan dan menekan sektor siklus.
Anggaran dan penghargaan: Pergerakan harga terkadang dapat mendahului keputusan kontrak, dengan kejelasan tiba ketika penghargaan diselesaikan.
Kapasitas produksi: Perusahaan dengan rekam jejak produksi dan pengiriman yang terbukti sering menarik perhatian investor paling banyak.
Kendala rantai pasokan: Tanah langka, propulsi, dan elektronik tetap menjadi hambatan potensial yang dapat membatasi seberapa cepat skala produksi.
Lensa jangka panjang
Konflik Iran 2026 pertama dan terutama merupakan tragedi kemanusiaan. Untuk pasar, ini juga dapat mewakili pergeseran dalam bagaimana pengeluaran keamanan nasional diprioritaskan dalam kerangka fiskal. Jika pengeluaran pertahanan tetap meningkat selama beberapa tahun, perusahaan dengan kapasitas manufaktur yang dapat diskalakan dan tumpukan teknologi terintegrasi dapat menarik perhatian investor yang berkelanjutan. Konon, pasar bergerak dalam siklus. Tema struktural dapat bertahan, tetapi mereka juga dapat harga ulang dengan cepat ketika asumsi berubah. Tetap analitis dan sadar risiko tetap penting.
Referensi ke perusahaan, sektor, atau pergerakan pasar tertentu disediakan hanya untuk komentar pasar umum dan bukan merupakan rekomendasi, penawaran atau ajakan untuk membeli atau menjual produk keuangan apa pun. Reaksi pasar terhadap peristiwa geopolitik atau makroekonomi dapat bergejolak dan tidak dapat diprediksi, dan hasil mungkin berbeda secara material dari ekspektasi.
So FY24 earnings are now done and from what we can see the results have been on the whole slightly better than expected. The catch is the numbers that we've seen for early FY25 which suggested any momentum we had from 2024 may be gone. So here are 8 things that caught our attention from the earnings season just completed.
Resilient Economy and Earnings Performance Resilience surprises remain: The Australian economy has shown remarkable resilience despite higher inflation and overall global pessimism. The resilience was reflected in the ASX 300, which closed the reporting season with a net earnings beat of 3 percentage points - a solid beat of the Street's consensus. This beat was primarily driven by better-than-expected margins, indicating that companies are effectively managing cost pressures through flexes in wages, inventories and nonessential costs.
The small guy is falling by wayside: However, the reporting outside of the ASX 300 paints a completely different picture. Over 53 per cent of firms missed estimates, size cost efficiencies and other methods larger firms can take were unable to be matched by their smaller counterparts. The fall in the ex-ASX 300 stocks was probably missed by most as it represents a small fraction of the ASX.
But nonetheless it's important to highlight as it's likely that what was seen in FY24 in small cap stocks will probably spread up into the larger market. Season on season slowdown is gaining momentum Smaller Beats what also caught our attention is the three-percentage point beat of this earnings season is 4 percentage points less than the beat in February which saw a seven-percentage point upside. That trend has been like this now for three consecutive halves and it's probable it will continue into the first half of FY25.
The current outlook from the reporting season is a slowing cycle, reducing the likelihood of positive economic surprises and earnings upgrades. Dividend Trends Going Oprah - Dividend Surprises: Reporting season ended with dividend surprises that were more aligned with earnings surprises, with a modest DPS (Dividends Per Share) beat of 2 percentage points. This marked a significant improvement from the initial weeks of the reporting season when conservative payout strategies led to more dividend misses.
The stronger dividends toward the end of the season signal some confidence in the future outlook despite conservative guidance. However, firms that did have banked franking credits or capital in the bank from previous periods they went Oprah and handed out ‘special dividends’ like confetti. While this was met with shareholder glee, it does also suggest that firms cannot see opportunity to deploy this capital in the current conditions.
That reenforces the views from point 2. Winners and Losers - Performance Growth Stocks Outperform: Growth stocks emerged as the clear winners of the reporting season, with a net beat of 30 percentage points. This performance was driven by strong margin surprises and the best free cash flow (FCF) surprise among any group.
However, there was a slight miss on sales, which was more than offset by higher margins. Sectors like Technology and Health were key contributors to the outperformance of Growth stocks. Stand out performers were the likes of SQ2, HUB, and TPW.
Globally-exposed Cyclicals Underperform: Global Cyclicals were the most disappointing, led by falling margins and sales misses. The earnings misses were attributed to slowing global growth and the rising Australian Dollar. Despite these challenges, Global Cyclicals did follow the dividend trend surprised to the upside.
Contrarian view might be to consider Global Cyclicals with the possibility the AUD begins to fade on RBA rate cuts in 2025. Mixed Results in Other Sectors: Resources: Ended the season with an equal number of beats and misses. Margins were slightly better than expected, and there was a positive cash flow surprise for some companies.
However, the sector faced significant downgrades, with FY25 earnings now expected to fall by 3.2 per cent. Industrials: Delivered growth with a nine per cent upside in EPS increases, although slightly below expectations. Defensives drove most of this growth, insurers however such as QBE, SUN, and HLI were drags.
Banks: Banks received net upgrades for FY25 earnings due to delayed rate cuts and lower-than-expected bad debts. However, earnings are still forecasted to fall by around 3 per cent in FY25. Defensives: Had a challenging reporting season, with net misses on margins.
Several major defensive stocks missed expectations and faced downgrades for FY25, which led to negative share price reactions. Future Gazing - Guidance and Earnings Outlook Vigilant Guidance has caused downgrades: As expected, many companies used the reporting season to reset earnings expectations. About 40 per cent in fact provided forecasts below consensus expectations, which in turn led to earnings downgrades for FY25 from the Street.
This cautious approach reflects the uncertainty in the economic environment and the potential for slower growth ahead, which was reflected in the FY24 numbers. Flat Earnings Forecast for FY25: The initial expectation of approximately 10 per cent earnings growth for FY25 has completely evaporated to just 0.1 per cent growth (yes, you read that correctly). This revision includes adjustments for the treatment of CDIs like NEM, which reduced earnings by 2.8 percentage point, and negative revisions in response to weaker-than-expected results, guidance, and lower commodity prices.
Resources were particularly impacted, with a 7.7 percentage point downgrade, leading to a forecasted earnings decline of 2.8 percent for the sector. Gazing into FY26: Early projections for FY26 suggest a 1.3 percent decline in earnings, driven by the expected declines in Resources and Banks due to net interest margins and commodity prices. However, Industrials are currently projected to deliver a 10.4 percent EPS growth, would argue this seems optimistic given the slowing economic cycle.
The Consensus Downgrades to 2025 Earnings: The consensus for ASX 300 earnings in 2025 was downgraded by 3 per cent during the reporting season. This reflects a broad range of negative revisions, with 23 percent of stocks facing downgrades. Biggest losers were sectors like Energy, Media, Utilities, Mining, Health, and Capital Goods all saw significant consensus downgrades, with Media particularly facing downgrades as budgets are slashed in half.
Flip side Tech, Telecom, Banks, and Financial Services, saw aggregate earnings upgrades. Notably, 78 percent of the banking sector received upgrades, reflecting some resilience in this group. Cash Flow and Margin Surprises Positive Cash Flow: Operating cash flow was a positive surprise, with 2 percentage point increase for Industrial and Resource stocks reporting cash flow at least 10 per cent above expectations.
The main drivers of this cash flow surprise were lower-than-expected tax and interest costs, along with positive EBITDA margin surprises. Capex: There were slightly more companies with higher-than-expected capex, but the impact on overall Free Cash Flow (FCF) was modest. Significant positive FCF surprises were seen in companies like TLS, QAN, and BHP, while WES, CSL, and WOW had negative surprises.
Final nuts and bolts Seasonal Downgrade Patterns: The peak in downgrades typically occurs during the full-year reporting season, so the significant downgrades seen in August are not necessarily a negative signal for the market. As the year progresses, the pace of downgrades may slow, and there could be some positive guidance surprises during the 2024 AGM season. However, with a slowing economic cycle, the likelihood of positive surprises is lower compared to 2023.
Overall, the reporting season highlighted the resilience of the Australian economy and the challenges facing certain sectors. While Growth stocks outperformed, the outlook for FY25 remains cautious with flat earnings growth and sector-specific headwinds. Investors will need to navigate a mixed landscape with potential opportunities in contrarian plays like Global Cyclicals, but also be mindful of the broader economic uncertainties.
Jadi inilah masalahnya: musim pendapatan AS April tiba di pasar yang masih terasa sama sekali tidak normal. Seperti yang dijelaskan GO Markets di Buku pedoman pendapatan AS global: Panduan penting untuk pedagang, periode pelaporan ini mendarat setelah perubahan nyata dalam apa yang dipedulikan pasar. Ini bukan lagi hanya tentang mengejar pertumbuhan dengan biaya berapa pun. Ini tentang apa yang dikatakan angka-angka di bawah permukaan.
Dan pada tahun 2026, sinyal-sinyal itu bertabrakan dengan latar belakang gesekan tinggi:
Konflik geopolitik: Ketegangan yang sedang berlangsung di Timur Tengah
Kejutan pasokan minyak: Minyak mentah Brent di atas US $100
The Fed: Bank Sentral Masih Terkena Inflasi
Pivot daya tahan
Ya, AI masih menjadi cerita utama pasar tetapi masih mesin mencolok yang mendapatkan sebagian besar perhatian. Tapi di bawahnya, ada langkah yang lebih tenang menuju perusahaan yang terlihat dibangun untuk bertahan lebih baik ketika kondisinya semakin sulit.
Ketika tarif tidak pasti dan pasar energi berada di bawah tekanan, nama-nama seperti JPMorgan Chase dan kontraktor pertahanan utama mulai membawa lebih banyak bobot. Mereka tidak menggantikan narasi AI, melainkan, mereka menjadi bagian dari cara pedagang membaca selera risiko, daya tahan pendapatan dan, pada akhirnya, di mana pasar mencari sesuatu yang lebih solid untuk dipertahankan.
!
Important: Reporting schedules can change without notice. Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are from third-party market consensus sources, as of 7 April 2026 (AEDT). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are from the latest company filings or results presentations unless stated otherwise. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
$JPM| Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
NYSE | Financial Services | 14 Apr 2026
Confirmed
Global Release Countdown (BMO)
00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$5.42
Consensus Revenue
US$47.88bn
AU/ASIA14 Apr | 8:45 pm
US/LATAM14 Apr | 6:45 am
Market Intelligence: $JPM
Analysis: JPM price drivers and scenarios
NII guidance
~US$103 billion
Full year | US$95 billionn ex:markets
ROTCE target
17%
Possible return on tangible common equity
Analyst range
US$5.02-5.70
Low to high estimate spread
AVG
LOW US$5.02AVG US$5.39HIGH US$5.70
The analyst spread of US$0.68 signals genuine disagreement about how the rate environment is flowing through to margins. A result above consensus but below the high end estimate may produce a muted reaction. A result above US$5.70 may shift the discussion.
Key swing factors for the result
Net interest income (NII)
The clearest macro lever. It reflects the gap between lending rates and deposit costs.
Guidance: US$103 billion for the full year
Return on tangible common equity (ROTCE)
A scale check. It indicates whether JPM is converting scale into efficiency. 17% is the benchmark.
Target: 17% ROTCE
Trading and investment banking
Strong Q1 growth was expected in fees and markets revenue. These lines can offset softness in lending, and stronger-than-expected performance here may shift the narrative away from rate sensitivity.
Watch: investment banking (IB) fees versus the prior quarter
Expense discipline
A bank can beat the EPS estimate and still sell off if expense growth is running too hot. Pairing the EPS result with the expense trajectory gives a fuller read on whether the beat is durable.
Watch: Expense outlook commentary
Trade Execution: $JPM
Earnings reaction framework: Q1 2026
Bull case
EPS above US$5.70, NII on track | ROTCE at or above 17%
The result comes in above the top of the analyst range. NII guidance holds or is revised higher. IB fees and markets revenue show strong Q1 growth. Expense commentary is constructive.
Possible reaction: momentum and repositioning
Base case
EPS between US$5.39 and US$5.70, NII in line | ROTCE near target
The result beats consensus but stays within the expected range. NII tracks guidance. The tone of the conference call may matter more than the headline number. The first move may fade if guidance is unchanged.
Possible reaction: muted or mixed initial response
Bear case
EPS below US$5.39 | NII misses | Expense growth surprises
The result comes in at or below the consensus midpoint. NII guidance is cut or qualified. Expense growth comes in above market expectations. IB or markets revenue disappoints.
Possible reaction: earnings multiple repricing
Reaction trigger to watch: The market response in the first 30 minutes after the result may indicate which scenario traders are leaning towards. A move above the prior session high on volume may support the bull case. A fade back into the range after an initial pop may point to the base case. A break below the prior session low on volume may suggest the bear case is gaining traction.
Sentiment Analysis · JPMorgan Chase
Interactive scenario analysis: $JPM
Select earnings outcome
Growth momentum
AI-linked offset, beat supported by NII and ROTCE
Stronger-than-expected demand for AI-related industrial lending may offset softer mortgage activity. Management maintains guidance as NII remains resilient in higher-for-longer conditions. IB fees and markets revenue may provide additional support. ROTCE at or above 17% would suggest the bank is converting scale into earnings efficiently.
EPS Outcome
Above US$5.70
NII Signal
On track
ROTCE
At or above 17%
Likely Reaction
Momentum may build
Sources & Data Methodology
Sources: Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are sourced from Bloomberg and Earnings Whispers, as at 7 April 2026 (AEDT). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are sourced from the latest company filings, results presentations or investor relations materials unless stated otherwise. Any scenario analysis reflects GO Markets analysis. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
From credit to defence
If JPMorgan gives the market an early read on the consumer, credit quality and business activity, the defence names may be telling a different story. This is the point where the focus may start to shift from the credit cycle to government-backed demand.
In a market still shaped by geopolitical risk, that matters. Long-dated programs can help support revenue visibility, even when the broader outlook looks less certain. That is one reason the sector remains on the watchlist.
$LMT| Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD
Lockheed Martin Corp.
NYSE | Aerospace | Defense | 22 Apr 2026
Estimated
Global Release Countdown (BMO)
00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$6.50
Consensus Revenue
US$16.32bn
AU | ASIA22 Apr | 9:20 pm
US | LATAM22 Apr | 7:20 am
Market Intelligence: $LMT
Analysis: LMT price drivers and scenarios
Order backlog
US$194 billionn
Record visibility
Book-to-bill
1.2x
Orders outpacing sales
Analyst range
US$6.90-7.10
Low to high estimate spread
AVG
LOW ~US$6.90AVG ~US$6.94HIGH US$7.10+
The consensus sits near the lower end of the analyst range. That positioning may leave room for upside if backlog growth and F-35 delivery timelines support execution. A print near the high end, above US$7.10, may extend the move, although the reaction would still depend on guidance and margins.
Key swing factors for the result
Backlog visibility
Primary evidence of demand. Book-to-bill above 1.2x would support full-year guidance and the production ramp.
Backlog: US$194 billion record
Free cash flow (FCF)
Defence stocks are often assessed on cash conversion. The market may look for confirmation of the US$6.5 billion floor.
Guide: US$6.5 billion - $6.8 billion
Missile segment growth
PrSM and THAAD deliveries remain key watchpoints. Strong space margins may help offset softness in aeronautics.
Watch: Fire Control margins
Margin pressure
Pension charges and production inflation remain risks. An earnings beat may fade if operating margins contract.
The result clears the upper half of the analyst range. Management reaffirms or raises the full-year FCF outlook. Strong Missiles and Fire Control (MFC) margins help offset any aeronautics supply chain lag.
Possible reaction: momentum may build and positioning may improve
Base case
EPS between US$6.30 and US$6.70 | Backlog steady at about US$194 billion
The result aligns with the US$6.38 consensus. F-35 delivery pace remains on track but offers no meaningful upside surprise. The market may wait for more specific segment guidance on the conference call.
Possible reaction: muted or mixed initial response
The result falls towards the bottom of the analyst spread. Management cites further software delays or program losses. The FCF trajectory narrows towards the lower end of previous expectations.
Possible reaction: the share price may come under pressure
Reaction trigger to watch: The market response in the first 30 minutes after the result may indicate which scenario traders are leaning towards. A move above the prior session high on volume may support the bull case. A fade back into the range after an initial pop may point to the base case. A break below the prior session low on volume may suggest the bear case is gaining traction.
Sentiment Analysis · Lockheed Martin
Interactive scenario analysis: $LMT
Select earnings outcome
Backlog confirmed
Backlog and FCF confirmation may support continuation
EPS clears the top of the analyst range. Backlog holds at or above US$194 billion and book-to-bill stays above 1.2, which would suggest orders are replenishing faster than revenue is being recognised. FCF guidance holds within the stated range.
EPS outcome
Above US$7.00
Backlog signal
Above US$194 billion
FCF guide
Holds or improves
Likely reaction
Continuation may follow
Sources & Data Methodology
Sources: Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are sourced from Bloomberg and Earnings Whispers, as at 7 April 2026 (AEDT). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are sourced from the latest company filings, results presentations or investor relations materials unless stated otherwise. Any scenario analysis reflects GO Markets analysis. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
Not all defence names are the same
Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman may sit in the same defence bucket, but the market does not always read them the same way. Lockheed is more closely tied to the F-35 and current air combat demand. Northrop is more closely linked to next-generation programs such as the B-21 Raider and Sentinel.
That gives this section its contrast. One is often read through the lens of current defence demand. The other is more closely tied to longer-cycle strategic modernisation.
$NOC| Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD
Northrop Grumman Corp.
NYSE | Defense | Space Systems | 23 Apr 2026
Estimated
Global Release Countdown (BMO)
00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$6.12
Consensus Revenue
US$10.24 bn
AU | ASIA23 Apr | 10:30 pm
US | LATAM23 Apr | 8:30 am
Market Intelligence: $NOC
Analysis: NOC price drivers and scenarios
Consensus EPS
US$6.96
Quarterly analyst average
Order Backlog
US$95.7 billion
Record revenue visibility
FY 2026 EPS guide
US$27.40-US$27.90
Full-year 2026 outlook
AVG
LOW ~US$6.90AVG ~US$6.96HIGH US$7.20+
The consensus sits near the lower end of the analyst range. That offers a quick visual for whether the result is merely in line or strong enough to ease the guidance concerns that weighed on the stock after its last update. A result above US$7.20 may shift the conversation more materially.
Key swing factors for the result
Book-to-bill ratio
Currently at 1.10, suggesting orders are still running ahead of revenue recognition. This remains an important signal for multi-year growth visibility in defence.
Watch: 1.10 target
Guidance reset risk
Management’s guidance previously came in below market expectations. The market may be sensitive to any further softening in the 2026 outlook.
Watch: guidance commentary
Program concentration
The B-21 Raider and Sentinel carry outsized execution sensitivity. Updates on production ramp and funding may be the clearest drivers of sentiment for the stock.
Watch: B-21 and Sentinel updates
Capacity investment
Higher capital expenditure (capex) supports the industrial base over the longer term, but it may pressure near-term margins. Watch for signs that current investment is weighing on earnings power.
The result comes in above the cited threshold. Management says B-21 Raider production is ahead of schedule, with improving margins. Sentinel program restructuring costs remain below baseline expectations. International awards lift the book-to-bill ratio above 1.15.
Possible reaction: momentum may improve
Base case
EPS between US$6.00 and US$6.20, backlog steady at about US$95.7 billion
The result is broadly in line with the cited range. FCF targets for 2026 are reaffirmed but not expanded. Market focus shifts to organic sales growth metrics and segment operating margins. The initial reaction may depend on the timing of B-21 milestone payments.
The result lands near the low end of the analyst spread. Management flags higher infrastructure costs for Sentinel or delays in restricted space segment awards. Margin pressure in Aeronautics persists, and the 2026 revenue guide narrows towards the US$43.5 billion floor.
Possible reaction: shares may weaken
Reaction trigger to watch: The market response in the first 30 minutes after the result may indicate which scenario traders are leaning towards. A move above the prior session high on volume may support the bull case. A fade back into the range after an initial pop may point to the base case. A break below the prior session low on volume may suggest the bear case is gaining traction.
Sentiment Analysis · Northrop Grumman
Interactive scenario analysis: $NOC
Select earnings outcome
Stealth momentum
B-21 momentum, stronger execution and FCF support
EPS clears US$6.15. Management confirms a production capacity agreement for the B-21 Raider. Sentinel restructuring reaches Milestone B on schedule. Record backlog visibility and higher FCF guidance towards US$3.5 billion may support broader repositioning.
EPS outcome
Above US$6.15
B-21 Signal
Acceleration
FCF guide
$3.5 billionn range
Likely reaction
Momentum rally
Sources & Data Methodology
Sources: Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are sourced from Bloomberg and Earnings Whispers, as at 7 April 2026 (AEDT). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are sourced from the latest company filings, results presentations or investor relations materials unless stated otherwise. Any scenario analysis reflects GO Markets analysis. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
Bottom line
In a market shaped by geopolitical risk and shifting rate expectations, companies with visible demand and longer-cycle revenue may continue to attract attention. But sentiment can still turn quickly if valuations are stretched, rate expectations shift again, or tensions in the Middle East ease.
That is why the story still needs to be tested against the numbers, not just the narrative. GO Markets will be analysing more companies throughout this earnings season. For more updates, visit our
earnings page,
follow our social media channels, or check the weekly newsletters.
Your next earnings setup starts here
Stay ahead of major beats, misses, and market surprises. Log in to your terminal, open a new account, or explore our dedicated earnings academy.
Jika Anda telah mengamati pasar selama setahun terakhir, Anda akan memperhatikan bahwa era “pertumbuhan dengan biaya berapa pun” telah secara efektif mencapai tembok. Siklus pendapatan April 2026 tiba pada saat fokus pasar telah mengalami reorientasi struktural. Ini bukan hanya tentang laporan laba rugi lagi. Ini tentang sinyal yang ada di belakang mereka.
Dengan ketidakpastian suku bunga yang masih ada dan guncangan geopolitik mendorong minyak di atas US $100, pedoman telah bergeser dari hype AI menuju ketahanan kelembagaan dan industrialisasi komputasi. Bagi pedagang di Australia, Asia dan Amerika Latin, hasil ini dapat bertindak sebagai cincin suasana hati untuk selera risiko global dan supercycle keamanan yang muncul.
Important - Dates, Times and Figures
All earnings dates marked as confirmed or estimated should be verified against current company investor relations calendars before you act on them. Reporting schedules can change without notice due to corporate decisions, regulatory requirements or exchange timetable adjustments.
The mechanics: How the timing works across time zones
The US earnings season does not arrive as a smooth drip. It arrives in waves. For non-US traders, the primary challenge is the overnight gap: major results land while you are away from your desk and can move index CFDs before your local market opens. Before market open (BMO) and after market close (AMC) matter just as much as the numbers themselves. The timing changes how quickly markets react, when liquidity is available and whether the first move has already happened before your session begins.
Mengapa BMO dan AMC penting
Hasil BMO mencapai sebelum pasar kas AS dibuka, sehingga penemuan harga terjadi dalam perdagangan pra-pasar di mana likuiditas lebih tipis dan pergerakan dapat dilebih-lebihkan. Hasil AMC mencapai setelah penutupan, yang berarti reaksi dikompresi ke jendela pra-pasar pendek keesokan paginya. Memahami jendela mana yang dilaporkan perusahaan Anda sama pentingnya dengan memahami apa yang dilaporkannya.
Institutional Grade Performance
Master the Markets with MetaTrader 5
Trade hundreds of instruments with superior speed and advanced technical analysis. Harness full EA functionality to execute your strategy.
For this cycle, the market is no longer rewarding AI mentions alone. It is looking for return on investment (ROI) proof. The four thematic snapshots below help explain where attention is likely to sit as results come through. Each theme has its own section with company cards that can be updated each quarter.
T1
Theme 1 — Institutional anchors
Defence against volatility
These companies are often watched as relative defensives during energy shocks and inflation spikes, although they remain exposed to normal share-price risk. When macro uncertainty rises, money has historically rotated toward businesses with contracted revenue, government-linked demand or pricing power that is not dependent on the consumer cycle — but past rotation patterns do not guarantee future performance.
JPM
JPMorgan Chase
Tuesday, 14 AprilConfirmed
Watch For
Net interest margin (NIM) under higher for longer rates, and whether AI spending remains cost neutral.
LMT
Lockheed Martin
Wednesday, 22 AprilEstimated
Watch For
F-35 delivery schedules and the company's ability to absorb tariff related costs on supply chain inputs.
NOC
Northrop Grumman
Monday, 27 AprilConfirmed
Watch For
B-21 Raider production progress and the conversion of its reported US$95.7 billion backlog into recognised revenue.
T2
Theme 2 — Tangible capital
EVs and energy
As parts of tech slow, investors have been rotating toward tangible, capital-intensive businesses. The energy transition and the infrastructure required to support AI data centre power demand have put utilities and energy companies in an unusual position: they are now growth stocks with defensive characteristics — though all remain subject to ordinary equity and sector risk.
TSLA
Tesla
Thursday, 23 AprilConfirmed
Watch For
The strategic shift from EV margins toward robotaxi and energy storage as the new growth narrative.
NEE
NextEra Energy
Friday, 24 AprilEstimated
Watch For
Data centre power demand and progress on its reported 30 GW contracted backlog as utilities face new infrastructure pressure.
XOM
Exxon Mobil
Wednesday, 29 AprilEstimated
Watch For
Permian and Guyana volume growth, and cash flow resilience during the Hormuz supply disruption.
T3
Theme 3 — The hardware invoice phase
AI infrastructure
This is the engine room of the S&P 500 and the part of the market most tied to whether AI capital expenditure is generating measurable returns. The question the market is now asking is not whether these companies are spending on AI. It is whether the spending is translating into capacity utilisation and revenue that justifies the multiple.
MSFT / GOOGL
Microsoft and Alphabet
Monday, 27 AprilEstimated
Watch For
Azure and Cloud capacity constraints against heavy AI capital expenditure. The gap between spending and utilisation is the market's primary concern.
NVDA
NVIDIA
Wednesday, 27 MayEstimated
Watch For
Blackwell GPU demand and gross margin sustainability as the product cycle matures and competition intensifies.
T4
Theme 4 — K-shaped recovery
Consumer platforms and devices
This theme tests the K-shaped consumer recovery: higher-income cohorts remain more resilient while lower-income cohorts face continued pressure from elevated borrowing costs and energy prices. Ad revenue and device upgrade cycles are the clearest indicators of where on the K-curve the consumer sits.
META / AMZN
Meta and Amazon
28 to 29 AprilEstimated
Watch For
AI-driven ad click improvements against Reality Labs spending and retail logistics costs as the profitability test for non-core investment.
AAPL
Apple
Thursday, 30 AprilEstimated
Watch For
iPhone upgrade cycle momentum and the Apple Intelligence rollout in China as the first real-world test of AI-driven hardware demand.
Analysis checklist: how to read each result
Use this structure for every company on your watchlist. A headline beat is common. The bigger market move often comes from how the market translates the details sitting behind the number.
1
Projected consensus
This is the bar for earnings per share (EPS) and revenue. Small beats may already be priced in. The market often sets a whisper number above the published consensus, so a technically positive result can still disappoint.
2
The call focus
Identify the single variable analysts are most focused on this cycle: capital expenditure versus margins, inventory turnover, customer growth rate, or contract backlog conversion.
3
The translation
A beat, meet or miss each carries a different market dynamic.
Beat
Matters most when forward guidance is credible. Without it, the initial move may reverse.
Meet
Often shifts focus to the tone of the call, particularly language around capacity or outlook.
Miss
Can be treated as the start of a trend and trigger a sharp repricing of valuation multiples.
The recency bias problem
The emotional trap many traders fall into is recency bias. Because the Magnificent 7 have led markets for so long, it can feel as though they are still the only trade that matters. That assumption deserves to be tested.
Perlu ditanyakan: Apakah perdagangan yang jelas sudah dihargai untuk kesempurnaan?
Tahun 2026 terbentuk sebagai tahun pembuktian. Perusahaan yang menghabiskan banyak uang untuk AI selama dua tahun terakhir sekarang diminta untuk menunjukkan pengembaliannya. Pasar tidak lagi menghargai pengumuman investasi AI. Ini menghargai bukti hasil pendapatan yang digerakkan oleh AI.
Pertanyaan pembingkaian yang lebih baik untuk setiap hasil adalah ini: apakah Anda bereaksi terhadap judul, atau apakah Anda menilai peran perusahaan dalam rantai pasokan AI fisik atau sebagai lindung nilai volatilitas potensial? Itu adalah tugas analitis yang sangat berbeda, dan mereka cenderung menghasilkan keputusan penentuan posisi yang sangat berbeda.
What to watch next
Three time horizons, three distinct signals. Update these each cycle with the most relevant near-term catalyst, the sector rotation to watch, and the longer-horizon dispersion theme.
Next Two Weeks
Consumer health barometer
Watch the 31 March Nike report as a lead indicator for consumer discretionary health. Footwear and apparel demand signals tend to front-run broader retail sentiment.
Next 30 Days
Bank lending and industrial demand
Focus shifts to the major banks. If loan demand tied to industrial and infrastructure projects remains firm, the earnings cycle may have support beyond the tech sector.
Next 60 Days
Wider dispersion between winners and losers
Watch for dispersion to widen. The companies converting heavy capital expenditure into measurable revenue outcomes may separate clearly from those that cannot.
Client & Education Portal
Follow the US Reporting Season
Stay ahead of major beats, misses, and market surprises. Log in to your terminal, open a new account, or explore our dedicated earnings academy.
Mulailah dengan apa yang sebenarnya terjadi pada pasar FX menjelang April: ada guncangan geopolitik dan pasokan minyak dari Timur Tengah berada di bawah tekanan. Reaksi langsung di seluruh pasar mata uang adalah yang telah dilihat pedagang sebelumnya: uang bergerak menuju keamanan, menuju imbal hasil, dan menjauh dari apa pun yang tampak terpapar gangguan.
Arus safe-haven memenuhi divergensi hasil
Dolar AS mendapat manfaat dari kedua kekuatan itu sekaligus. Ini adalah tempat yang aman dan juga membawa keuntungan hasil yang tidak dapat ditandingi oleh sebagian besar rekan-rekannya saat ini. Franc Swiss mengambil beberapa luapan dari penghindaran risiko Eropa. Yen, yang dulunya menarik arus safe-haven hampir secara otomatis, terjebak dalam situasi yang berbeda sama sekali di mana kesenjangan hasil terhadap dolar sekarang begitu luas sehingga logika safe-haven telah digantikan oleh logika carry.
Mata uang yang mengalami bulan terberat adalah yang terjebak di tengah: sensitif terhadap risiko, terkait komoditas, atau menjalankan suku bunga kebijakan yang tidak dapat bersaing. Dolar Selandia Baru adalah contoh paling jelas sementara dolar Australia adalah cerita yang lebih berantakan. Di bawah semua itu adalah penetapan harga ulang ekspektasi penurunan suku bunga 2026 yang sekarang dinilai kembali oleh bank sentral di beberapa negara.
DXY context
Regained 100 on geopolitical risk
Strongest currency
USD — safe haven plus yield
Weakest currency
NZD — yield gap plus energy
Main central bank theme
Repricing of 2026 rate cut paths
Main catalyst ahead
Fed and BOJ policy meetings
Monthly leaderboard — biggest movers
01USD
Rose sharply on safe-haven demand and higher for longer yield expectations.
Strong
02CHF
Advanced strongly as the preferred European refuge from Middle East risk.
Up
03JPY
Highly volatile; fell to 20-month lows before intervention commentary.
Volatile
04AUD
Mixed; caught between domestic energy inflation and a hawkish RBA.
Mixed
05NZD
Fell sharply; pressured by energy exposure and capital outflows.
Weak
Penggerak terkuat: Dolar AS (USD)
Dolar AS menghabiskan sebagian besar tahun 2025 secara bertahap kehilangan tanah karena Fed memangkas suku bunga dan seluruh dunia mengejar ketinggalan. Cerita itu terhenti dengan keras pada akhir Maret. Konflik Iran mengubah kalkulus, dan dolar menegaskan kembali dirinya dengan cara yang mencerminkan sesuatu yang nyata tentang posisi strukturalnya di pasar global.
AS mengekspor minyak dan ketika harga energi naik, itu adalah perbaikan syarat perdagangan, bukan kejutan istilah perdagangan. Sebagian besar mata uang utama dolar berada di sisi lain dari persamaan itu. Tambahkan kisaran suku bunga kebijakan 3,50% hingga 3,75% yang sekarang terlihat terkunci lebih lama, dan keuntungan dolar bersifat siklus dan struktural pada saat yang bersamaan. Indeks Dolar AS (DXY) telah kembali ke level 100 tetapi Pertanyaan menuju April adalah apakah itu bertahan di sana atau mendorong lebih jauh.
Key drivers
Safe-haven demand:
The Iran conflict directed flows into US assets across equities, Treasuries, and the dollar itself.
Yield advantage:
The federal funds rate at 3.50% to 3.75% provides a meaningful return floor relative to most peers, helping to sustain capital inflows.
Energy insulation:
The US position as an oil exporter creates a structural terms-of-trade benefit when oil prices rise sharply.
Rate cut repricing:
Market expectations for 2026 Fed cuts have been scaled back significantly, removing a key source of dollar headwinds.
What markets are watching next
The DXY's ability to hold above 100 is the near-term reference point. The 10 April CPI print is the most direct test. A reading above expectations may add further support, while a soft print could give traders reason to take some dollar positions off the table.
The main risks to the upside case are a sudden diplomatic resolution in the Middle East, which could reduce safe-haven demand quickly, or a labour market print on 3 April that is weak enough to revive recession concerns and push rate cut expectations higher again.
Penggerak terlemah: Dolar Selandia Baru (NZD)
Jika Anda ingin merancang mata uang yang akan berjuang di lingkungan saat ini, NZD cocok dengan brief hampir sempurna. Ini sensitif terhadap risiko. Ini terkait dengan komoditas. Ini menjalankan suku bunga kebijakan 2,25%, yang berada di bawah Fed dan sekarang di bawah RBA juga. Selandia Baru juga merupakan importir energi, sehingga kenaikan harga minyak menghantam neraca perdagangan dan prospek inflasi domestik pada saat yang bersamaan.
Tak satu pun dari hal-hal itu baru tetapi kombinasi dari semuanya sekaligus, dengan latar belakang dolar yang melonjak dan sentimen risiko yang luas, telah menekan NZD dengan cara yang sulit untuk diabaikan. Carry trade yang pernah membuat NZD menarik telah berbalik karena modal bergerak keluar, bukan masuk.
Key drivers
Energy import exposure:
Rising Brent crude hits New Zealand's trade balance directly and adds upside pressure to domestic inflation.
Yield gap:
The 2.25% Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) policy rate sits below the Fed and the RBA, sustaining negative carry against both the USD and AUD.
Risk-off positioning:
As a commodity and risk currency, the NZD tends to underperform when global sentiment deteriorates.
Trade uncertainty:
Ongoing tariff related uncertainty continues to weigh on export sector confidence.
Risks and constraints
Any unexpected hawkish commentary from the RBNZ or a sharp decline in oil prices could provide some relief. A broader improvement in global risk appetite would also tend to benefit the NZD, given its sensitivity to sentiment shifts.
But the structural yield disadvantage is not going away quickly, and that may continue to limit the pair's recovery potential.
USD/JPY
USD/JPY adalah pasangan yang paling jelas menggambarkan apa yang terjadi ketika status safe-haven mata uang diganti oleh logika carry. Yen dulunya merupakan pelabuhan panggilan pertama bagi para pedagang yang mencari perlindungan selama tekanan geopolitik. Dinamika itu telah ditekan, dan alasannya sangat mudah: Anda melepaskan terlalu banyak hasil untuk menahan yen sekarang.
Suku bunga kebijakan Bank of Japan (BOJ) berada di 0,75% sementara Fed berada di 3,50% hingga 3,75% dan kesenjangan itu tidak mendorong aliran safe-haven. Ini mendorong pinjaman dalam yen dan penyebaran di tempat lain. Jadi sementara dolar naik karena risiko geopolitik, yen jatuh pada peristiwa yang sama. Bukan seperti itu seharusnya bekerja, tetapi begitulah cara kerja matematika ketika perbedaan hasil seluas ini.
USD/JPY berada di dekat 159, yang membuatnya tidak jauh dari level 160 yang secara konsisten ditandai oleh Kementerian Keuangan Jepang sebagai garis yang membutuhkan perhatian. Pertemuan BOJ pada 27 dan 28 April sekarang menjadi acara yang benar-benar langsung.
Key events to watch
Tokyo CPI, 30 March (AEDT):
March inflation data. A strong read may build the case for BOJ action at the April meeting.
BOJ meeting, 27 and 28 April (AEST):
Markets are treating this as a live event. The quarterly outlook report may include updated inflation forecasts that shift rate hike timing expectations.
Intervention watch:
Japan's Ministry of Finance has been explicit about the 160 level. Actual intervention, or a credible threat of it, could trigger a sharp and fast reversal.
What could shift the outlook
A hawkish BOJ, actual FX intervention, or a softer US CPI print that reduces dollar support could all push USD/JPY lower from current levels. On the other side, a dovish hold from the BOJ combined with continued dollar strength could see the pair test 160 and potentially beyond, which would likely intensify the intervention conversation in Tokyo.
For traders watching AUD/JPY and other yen crosses, the BOJ meeting on 27 and 28 April carries similar weight. A hawkish shift tends to compress yen crosses broadly, not just USD/JPY.
Data untuk ditonton selanjutnya
Empat acara menonjol sebagai katalis FX potensial paling jelas dalam minggu-minggu mendatang. Masing-masing memiliki saluran transmisi langsung ke ekspektasi suku bunga, dan ekspektasi suku bunga mendorong sebagian besar pergerakan FX saat ini.
Key dates and FX sensitivity
30
Mar
Tokyo CPI
JPY pairs, USD/JPY · AEDT
A strong read may strengthen the case for a more hawkish BOJ at the April meeting.
3
Apr
US labour market (NFP)
USD pairs, AUD/USD, NZD/USD · 10:30 pm AEDT
A weak result could revive recession concerns and alter Fed pricing.
10
Apr
US CPI - March
USD/JPY, EUR/USD, gold · 10:30 pm AEST
The most direct test of whether inflation is easing fast enough to reopen the rate cut conversation.
27-28
Apr
BOJ meeting and quarterly outlook report
JPY crosses, AUD/JPY · AEST
The key policy event for yen crosses. Updated inflation forecasts may shift rate hike timing expectations.
Level dan sinyal kunci
Ini adalah titik referensi yang paling diperhatikan oleh para pedagang dan pembuat kebijakan. Masing-masing mewakili pemicu potensial untuk pergeseran posisi atau respons resmi.
◆
DXY 100.00
A psychologically and technically significant support level. Holding above it may sustain the dollar's current run across major pairs. A break below it would likely signal a broader sentiment shift.
◆
USD/JPY 160.00
Japan's Ministry of Finance has consistently referenced this level as a threshold requiring attention. Actual intervention, or a credible threat of it, has historically been capable of producing sharp and fast reversals in the pair.
◆
Brent crude US$120
A move to this level would likely intensify risk off behaviour across FX markets, putting further pressure on energy importing currencies including the NZD, EUR, and JPY.
◆
AUD/USD 0.7000
This level has historically attracted buying interest and may act as a near term directional reference for positioning in the pair.
Bottom line
The FX moves heading into April were shaped by a combination of geopolitical shock, yield divergence, and a repricing of central bank expectations that few had positioned for at the start of the quarter. The dollar's dual role as a high yielding and safe haven currency has put it in an unusually strong position, but that position is not unconditional.
One soft CPI print, one diplomatic breakthrough, or one labour market miss could change the tone quickly. Currency moves may remain highly data dependent and sensitive to overnight news flow from the Middle East, where developments can gap markets before the next session opens.
Akses dunia FX yang lebih luas dan tetap fleksibel saat kondisi berubah. Buka akun · Masuk
