Counting the cost of poor trading discipline – A motivation for change
Mike Smith
6/2/2023
•
0 min read
Share this post
Copy URL
Before we start, this is one of those “tell-it-how-it-is” articles, so perhaps turn your sensitivity meter down a little and read this in the nurturing, supportive spirit in which it was written. It does involve some work for those who are serious about growing as a trader, so be warned it lays down a challenge to act. The bottom line is that you may have done the ‘technical’ learning, have the optimum trading plan on the planet, but many traders do NOT get the results that may be possible due to their level of trading discipline.
If one has planned an effective exit strategy, and position sizes appropriately, accepting that some trades will go against you, rarely do the major account draw-downs happen that many, many traders sustain unless you stray from your system. More commonly, and arguably almost invariably, major draw-downs are a result of ineffective systems (and if you have not got a trading plan in place, get one!) or poor discipline in execution. The reality is that one bad trade where discipline is noticeably absent can remove weeks or even months of positive results.
But there is another “trading beast” at play here, even if one doesn’t have the major draw-down in one or two trades, there is the insidious impact of regular “smaller” discipline issues that can nibble away at your account value over a period of time. It is the latter that is the focus of this article. Why this “counting the cost” approach?
The educational aim for this article, is to stimulate some evidence gathering that may indicate that something NEEDS to change in your trading. If we look to the academic work if what motivates changes, there is a principle of interest that could be relevant. Firstly, if we look to Motivational Hedonistic theory, this suggests that people (and that includes traders) are motivated to change by either pleasure (in this context positive trading results) or avoiding pain (or negative trading results).
The reality is, as stated previously, that many traders have this insidious reduction of account value, or as an alternative “bumble along” finding themselves in a small gain following by small loss cycle and never seem to move forward. This ‘middle ground’ neither causing the two extremes of trading pleasure or pain, may result in a complacency and fail to provide the motivation to take real and meaningful action to change results. In this case, a logical approach would be to do some work that produces the evidence and jolts the trader out of this minimal action state.
This is what the following exercise aims to do or in other words, we are going to try to create some pleasure or pain to be your motivator to take any action you need to. The idea is, if we can mirror those trades that followed what we planned to do (and take pleasure from that), and removed the execution errors (and so the pain created by that evidence), then we have the platform to change positively. 3 steps to create the trading motivation to change What you need before you start Ring-fence some time (after all your trading future could depend on it!) A critical mass of your latest trades to review (we suggest a minimum of twenty) Your trading platform to historically look at charts and the honesty to record “what happened”. Your bottom-line result on our account as a benchmark of what really happened.
Step 1 – Dividing your trades. Objectively look at the trades you have taken. Make two columns, dividing these into those which you adhered to plan (“1”) and those which you did not (“2”).
Remember, exits and position sizing are the key things to include, not only those when you let a loss run but also those where you cut a potential profit short in a trade in your “2” column ( not including pre-planned profit targets). Remember also to take a loss that did adhere to plan goes in column 1. Step 2 – Analysis stage 1 – The trading pain/pleasure overview Let’s start with some simple analysis.
Total the results from each column and make a judgement of what these totals mean on where your account could have been, your execution discipline and the level of pain or pleasure you feel when you look at each column. Step 3 – “Turning the screw” – Analysis stage 2 At a deeper level we can start to look at what would have happened in those trades in column 2, ONLY if you had executed as you should. Look back at those charts specifically and dependent on what you failed to execute, record what would have happened if you had positioned sizes appropriately, had a system stop in place (or not moved your original stop when you shouldn’t have), and if you hadn’t pressed the exit button too early when you should have adhered to your trail stop strategy fully.
In recording the difference of potential versus the reality, there may be the level of pain to create that “MUST DO” feeling to take appropriate and meaningful action going forward. To summarise, often we need to “ram home” what is happening in our trading to take the action to grow as a trader and increase the likelihood of improving results. Doing the suggested practical exercise may give you the impetus to not only stick to plan, but also consequently gain the opportunity to start objectively looking at how to improve that plan to better fit you as an individual trader.
And finally One final thought, many traders come into trading with the desire to do this for a lifetime. The risk therefore of NOT addressing this, is that you not only lose a large proportion of the original capital you put into the market, but ultimately for many traders, but because there has been inaction in putting right things you need to, their pain may lead them to remove themselves from the market and destroy the potential that a lifetime of trading could create. Mike Smith Educator GO Markets Disclaimer The article from GO Markets analysts is based on their independent analysis.
Views expressed are of their own and of a ‘general’ nature. Advice (if any) are not based on the reader’s personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Readers should, therefore, consider how appropriate the advice (if any) is to their objectives, financial situation and needs, before acting on the advice.
By
Mike Smith
Mike Smith (MSc, PGdipEd)
Client Education and Training
The information provided is of general nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situations or needs. Before acting on any information provided, you should consider whether the information is suitable for you and your personal circumstances and if necessary, seek appropriate professional advice. All opinions, conclusions, forecasts or recommendations are reasonably held at the time of compilation but are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Go Markets Pty Ltd, ABN 85 081 864 039, AFSL 254963 is a CFD issuer, and trading carries significant risks and is not suitable for everyone. You do not own or have any interest in the rights to the underlying assets. You should consider the appropriateness by reviewing our TMD, FSG, PDS and other CFD legal documents to ensure you understand the risks before you invest in CFDs. These documents are available here. Any references to Australian or international shares, sectors, indices, ETFs, crypto-related stocks or other instruments are provided for market commentary and watchlist purposes only and do not constitute a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any financial product or adopt any investment strategy. International markets may involve additional risks, including currency fluctuations, regulatory differences, market structure differences, reduced liquidity and higher volatility. Company-specific, sector-specific and macroeconomic risks may also affect performance.
Commentary on geopolitical developments, economic data, central bank decisions, earnings, policy changes and other global or financial market events is based on information available at the time of publication and may change without notice. Such events can lead to sudden market moves, price gaps, reduced liquidity, wider spreads and increased volatility, particularly in leveraged products such as CFDs. Forward-looking statements, expectations and scenario analysis are inherently uncertain and should not be relied on as guarantees of future market behaviour or outcomes.
With the Iran conflict reshaping energy markets, central banks turning hawkish, and gold in freefall despite the chaos, the safe haven playbook in 2026 is more complicated than ever.
Quick facts
Gold has fallen more than 20% from its all-time high, despite an active war in the Middle East
The Singapore dollar is near its strongest level against the USD since October 2014
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) hiked rates to 4.10% in March 2026 as Iran-driven oil prices push Australian inflation higher
1. Gold (XAU/USD)
Gold remains the most widely traded safe haven globally. It benefits from geopolitical stress, US dollar weakness, and negative real interest rate environments. However, its short-term behaviour in 2026 demands explanation.
Despite an active war in the Middle East, gold has sold off sharply. The likely cause is the Fed trimming its 2026 rate cut projections, citing hotter-than-expected producer inflation and Strait of Hormuz-driven oil prices creating inflation persistence.
Ultimately, gold's bull case rests on falling real yields and a weaker dollar, and right now neither condition is in place. Traders should be aware that during an inflationary supply shock like the one the Iran conflict has delivered, gold does not always behave as expected.
However, if you zoom out, the longer-term picture reinforces gold’s safe-haven status, ending 2025 as one of its strongest years on record.
Key variables to watch: US Federal Reserve guidance, real yields, and USD direction.
2. Japanese Yen (JPY)
The yen has long functioned as a safe-haven currency thanks to Japan's status as the world's largest net creditor nation. In times of stress, Japanese investors tend to repatriate capital, driving the yen higher.
However, that dynamic seems to have shifted in 2026 so far. The yen is down 6.63% YoY, near its weakest level since July 2024, and surging oil import costs are weighing on the currency.
The yen's safe-haven role has not disappeared, though. It tends to reassert itself during sharp equity selloffs and liquidity events. But in an oil-driven inflation shock, it faces structural headwinds.
Key variables to watch: BOJ rate decisions, US-Japan yield differentials, and any intervention signals from Japanese authorities.
3. Swiss Franc (CHF)
Switzerland's political neutrality, account surplus, and strong institutional framework make the franc a reflexive safe-haven currency. Unlike the yen, the CHF is holding up in the current environment, with the franc gaining against the dollar in 2026, and EUR/CHF remaining stable.
For traders across Europe and the Middle East, CHF is often the first port of call during stress events.
Key variables to watch: Swiss National Bank intervention language, European geopolitical developments, and global risk indices.
4. US Treasury Bonds (US10Y)
Under normal conditions, US government bonds are some of the deepest, most liquid safe-haven instruments in the world. But 2026 is not normal conditions…
Yields have been rising, not falling, meaning bond prices are moving in the wrong direction for anyone seeking safety.
When yields rise during a risk-off event, it signals the market is treating bonds as an inflation risk rather than a safety asset.
However, short-duration Treasuries like bills and 2-year notes are a different story. They may offer higher income with less duration risk than longer-dated bonds, which is why some investors use them more defensively in volatile periods.
Key variables to watch: Fed communication, CPI and PCE data, and whether the 10Y yield breaks above 4.50% or pulls back below 4.00%.
5. Australian Dollar vs. US Dollar (AUD/USD): inverse play
The Australian dollar is widely considered a risk-on currency, tied closely to global commodity demand and Chinese growth.
In risk-off environments, AUD/USD typically falls. A falling AUD/USD can serve as a leading indicator of broader global stress, which can be useful context for traders with regional exposure.
The RBA hiking cycle (two hikes since the start of 2026) is providing some floor under the AUD, but in a sustained global risk-off move, that support has limits.
Key variables to watch: RBA forward guidance, Chinese PMI data, iron ore prices, and oil's impact on Australian inflation expectations.
6. US Dollar Index (DXY)
The US dollar acts as the world's reserve currency and a reflexive safe haven during acute stress. When liquidity dries up, global demand for USD tends to spike regardless of the underlying trend.
Over the past 12 months, the dollar has lost ground as global confidence in US fiscal trajectory has wavered. But over the past month, it has firmed, supported by a hawkish Fed and elevated geopolitical risk.
In risk-off environments, the USD continues to attract safe-haven flows. However, rising oil prices can increase inflation risks, complicating Federal Reserve policy expectations.
Key variables to watch: Fed rate path, US inflation data, and global liquidity conditions.
7. Singapore Dollar (SGD)
Less discussed globally but highly relevant across Southeast Asia, the SGD is one of the most quietly resilient currencies in the current environment.
The Singapore dollar has advanced to near its highest level since October 2014, supported by safe haven flows and investors drawn to Singapore's AAA-rated bonds, a dividend-heavy stock market, and predictable government policies.
The MAS manages the SGD through a nominal effective exchange rate band rather than an interest rate, giving it a different character from other safe-haven currencies.
For traders with exposure to Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and the broader ASEAN region, USD/SGD can act as a practical benchmark for regional risk appetite.
Key variables to watch: MAS policy band adjustments, regional trade flows, and USD/Asia dynamics more broadly.
8. Cash and Short-Duration Fixed Income
Sometimes, the most effective safe haven can be to simply reduce exposure. With central bank rates still elevated across major economies, cash and short-duration government bonds can offer a meaningful yield while sitting outside market risk.
The RBA raised the cash rate to 4.10% at its March meeting. The Bank of England held at 3.75%, while the ECB kept its deposit facility rate at 2.00% and main refinancing rate at 2.15%.Across all major economies, short-duration government paper is offering a real return for the first time in years.
In a volatile environment, capital preservation can sometimes matter more than return maximisation.
Key variables to watch: Central bank meeting calendars across all major economies, and any shifts in forward guidance on the rate path.
What to Watch Next
Fed inflation data. Core PCE is the single most important data point for gold, bonds, and the dollar right now. Any surprise in either direction could move all three simultaneously.
Yen intervention risk. The yen is near levels that have previously triggered action from Japanese authorities. Traders with Asia-Pacific exposure should monitor closely.
RBA's next move. With Australia now at 4.10% and inflation still above target, the question is whether the hiking cycle has further to run. The next RBA meeting is on 5 May.
Geopolitical trajectory. Any move toward de-escalation in the Middle East would quickly reduce safe haven demand and rotate capital back into risk assets. The reverse is equally true.
China's growth signal. A stronger-than-expected Chinese recovery could lift commodity currencies and reduce defensive positioning across Asia-Pacific.
The Longer-Term Lens
The 2026 environment is exposing that the effectiveness of safe haven assets depends on the type of shock, not just its severity.
An inflationary supply shock like the Iran conflict has delivered is one of the most difficult environments for traditional safe havens.
Gold falls as real yields rise. Bonds sell off as inflation expectations climb. Even the yen can weaken as Japan's import costs surge.
What has held up are assets with institutional credibility, managed frameworks, and deep liquidity regardless of macro conditions. The Swiss franc, Singapore dollar, and short-duration cash instruments fit that description better than gold or long bonds do right now.
In 2026, the question for traders is not "which safe haven?" It is "a safe haven from what?"
If you've spent any time looking at a trading terminal, you've seen it. A news headline breaks, a chart line snaps, and suddenly everyone is rushing for the same exit or the same entrance. It looks like chaos. In practice, it is often a chain of mechanical responses.
This matters for a couple of reasons. Many readers assume the story is the trade. It is not. The story, whether it is an interest rate decision, a supply shock or an earnings miss, is the fuel and the playbook is the engine.
Below are seven core strategies often used in contracts for difference (CFDs) trading. With CFDs, you are not buying the underlying asset. You are speculating on the change in value. That means a trader can take a long position if the price rises, or a short position if it falls.
Seven strategies to understand first
1. Trend following (the establishment play)
Trend following works on the idea that a market already in motion can remain in motion until it meets a clear structural obstacle. Some market participants view it as a chart-based approach because it focuses on the prevailing direction rather than trying to call an exact turning point.
The rationale: The aim is to identify a clear directional bias, such as higher highs and higher lows, and follow that momentum rather than position against it.
What traders look for: Exponential moving averages (EMAs), such as the 50-day or 200-day EMA, are commonly used to interpret trend strength, though indicators can produce false signals and are not reliable on their own.
Source: GO Markets | Educational example only.
How it works: The 50-period EMA can act as a dynamic support level that rises as price rises. In an uptrend, some traders watch for the market to make a new higher high (HH), then pull back towards the EMA before moving higher again. Each higher low (HL) may suggest buyers are still in control.
When price touches or comes close to the 50-period EMA during that pullback, some traders treat that area as a potential decision zone rather than assuming the trend will resume automatically.
What to watch: The sequence of HHs and HLs is part of the structural evidence of a trend. If that sequence breaks, for example if price falls below the previous HL, the trend may be weakening and the setup may no longer hold.
2. Range trading (the ping-pong play)
Markets can spend long stretches moving sideways. That creates a range, where buyers and sellers are in temporary balance. Range trading is built around this behaviour, focusing on moves near the bottom and top of an established range.
The rationale: Price moves between a floor, known as support, and a ceiling, known as resistance. Moves near those boundaries can help define the width of the range.
What traders look for: Some traders use oscillators such as the Relative Strength Index (RSI) to help judge whether the asset looks overbought or oversold near each boundary.
Source: GO Markets | Educational example only.
How it works: The support level is a price zone where buying interest has historically been strong enough to stop the market from falling further. The resistance level is where selling pressure has historically prevented further gains.
When price approaches support, some traders look for signs of a potential rebound. When it approaches resistance, they look for signs that momentum may be fading. RSI readings below 35 can suggest the market is oversold near support, while readings above 65 can suggest it is overbought near resistance.
What to watch: The main risk in range trading is a breakout, when price pushes decisively through either level with strong momentum. This may signal the start of a new trend and using a stop-loss just outside the range on each trade may help manage that risk.
3. Breakouts (the coiled spring play)
Eventually, every range comes under pressure. A breakout happens when the balance shifts and price pushes through support or resistance. Markets alternate between periods of low volatility, where price moves sideways in a tight range, and high-volatility bursts where price can make a larger directional move.
The rationale: Quiet consolidation can sometimes be followed by a broader expansion in volatility. The tighter the compression, the more energy may be stored for the next move.
What traders look for: Bollinger Bands are often used to interpret changes in volatility. When the bands tighten, a squeeze is forming. Some market participants view a move outside the bands as a sign that conditions may be changing.
Source: GO Markets | Educational example only.
How it works: Bollinger Bands consist of a middle line, the 20-period moving average, and 2 outer bands that expand or contract based on recent price volatility. When the bands narrow and come close together, the squeeze, the market has been unusually calm.
This is often described as a coiled spring. Energy may be building, and a sharper move can follow. Some traders treat the first move through an outer band as an early clue on direction, rather than a definitive signal on its own.
What to watch: Not every squeeze leads to a powerful breakout. A false breakout occurs when price briefly moves outside a band, then quickly reverses back inside. Waiting for the candle to close outside the band, rather than entering mid-candle, can reduce the risk of being caught in a false move.
4. News trading (the deviation play)
This is event-driven trading. The focus is on the gap between what the market expected and what the data or headline actually delivered. Economic data releases, such as inflation figures (CPI), employment reports and central bank decisions, can cause sharp, fast moves in financial markets.
The rationale: High-impact releases, such as inflation data or central bank decisions, can force a fast repricing of assets. The bigger the surprise relative to expectations, the larger the move may be.
What traders look for: Traders often use an economic calendar to track timing. Some focus on how the market behaves after the initial reaction, rather than treating the first move as definitive.
Source: GO Markets | Educational example only.
How it works: Before the news, price may move in a calm, tight range as traders wait. When the data is released, if the actual reading differs significantly from the consensus expectation, repricing can happen fast.
Gold, for example, may spike sharply on a CPI reading that comes in above expectations. However, the candle can also print a very long upper wick, meaning price reached the spike high but was then rejected strongly. Sellers may step in quickly, and price may retrace. This spike-and-retrace pattern is one of the more recognisable setups in news trading.
What to watch: The direction and size of the initial spike do not always tell the full story. Wick length can offer an important clue. A long wick may suggest the initial move was rejected, while shorter wicks after a data release may indicate a more sustained directional move.
5. Mean reversion (the rubber-band play)
Prices can sometimes move too far, too fast. Mean reversion is built on the idea that an overextended move may drift back towards its historical average, like a rubber band pulled too tight, then snapping back.
The rationale: This is a contrarian approach. It looks for stretches of optimism or pessimism that may not be sustainable, and positions for a return to equilibrium.
What traders look for: A common example is price moving well away from a 20-day moving average (MA) while RSI also reaches an extreme reading. In that setup, traders watch for a move back towards the mean rather than a continuation away from it.
Source: GO Markets | Educational example only.
How it works: The 20-period MA represents the market's recent average price. When price moves into an extreme zone, such as more than 3 standard deviations above or below that average, it has moved a long way from its recent trend.
An RSI above 70 can suggest the market is stretched to the upside, while below 30 can suggest the same to the downside. Some mean reversion traders use these combined signals as a sign that a pullback towards the 20-period MA may be possible, rather than assuming the move will continue to extend.
What to watch: Mean reversion strategies can carry significant risk in strongly trending markets. A market can remain extended for longer than expected, and a position entered against the short-term trend can generate large drawdowns. Position sizing and clear stop-losses are critical.
6. Psychological levels (the big figure play)
Markets are driven by people, and people tend to focus on round numbers. US$100, US$2,000 or parity at 1.000 on a currency pair can act as magnets. In financial markets, certain price levels can attract a disproportionate amount of buying and selling activity, not because of technical analysis alone, but because of human psychology.
The rationale: Large orders, stop-losses and take-profit levels can cluster around these big figures, which may reinforce support or resistance. This self-reinforcing behaviour is one reason these rejections can become meaningful for traders.
What traders look for: Traders often watch how price behaves as it approaches a round number. The market may hesitate, reject the level or break through it with momentum. Multiple wick rejections at the same level may carry more weight than a single one.
Source: GO Markets | Educational example only.
How it works: When price approaches a round number from below, some traders watch for long upper wicks, the thin vertical line above the candle body. A long upper wick means price reached that level, but sellers stepped in aggressively and pushed it back down before the candle closed.
One wick rejection may be notable. Three in a cluster may be more significant. Some traders use this accumulated rejection as part of the case for a short (sell) setup at that level.
What to watch: Psychological levels can also act as magnets in the opposite direction. If price breaks through with conviction, the level may then act as support. A decisive close above the level, rather than just a wick break, can be an early sign that the rejection setup is no longer holding.
7. Sector rotation (the economic season play)
This is a macro strategy. As the economic backdrop changes, capital may move from higher-growth sectors into more defensive ones, and back again. Not all parts of the sharemarket move in the same direction at the same time.
The rationale: In a slowing economy, discretionary spending may weaken while demand for essential services can remain more stable. Investors may rotate capital between sectors accordingly.
What traders look for: With CFDs, some traders express this view through relative strength, taking exposure to a stronger sector while reducing or offsetting exposure to a weaker one.
Source: GO Markets | Educational example only.
How it works: During a growth phase, when the economy is expanding, investors tend to prefer growth-oriented sectors like technology. As the economic environment shifts, perhaps due to rising interest rates, slowing earnings or increasing recession risk, a rotation point may emerge.
In the slowdown phase, the pattern can reverse. Technology may weaken while utilities may strengthen, as investors move capital into defensive, income-generating sectors. Early signals can include relative underperformance in growth sectors combined with unusual strength in defensives.
What to watch: Sector rotation is not usually an overnight event. It typically unfolds over weeks to months. Tracking the ratio between two sectors, often shown in a relative strength chart, can make this shift visible before it becomes obvious in absolute price terms.
Why risk management is the engine of survival
The headline move is one thing. The market implication for your account is another. If you do not manage the mechanics, the strategy does not matter.
Because CFDs are traded on margin, a small market move may have an outsized impact on the account. If leverage is too high, even a minor wobble may trigger a margin call or automatic position closure, depending on the provider's terms. This is not a theoretical risk. It is a common reason new traders lose more than they expected on a trade that was directionally correct.
The market does not always move in a straight line. Sometimes, price gaps from one level to another, especially after a weekend or major news event and in those conditions, a stop-loss may not be filled at the exact requested price. That is known as slippage. It is one reason large positions may carry additional risk into major announcements.
Bottom line
The vehicle is powerful, but the playbook is what helps keep you on the road.
The obvious trade is often already priced in. What matters more is understanding which market condition is in front of you. Is it trending, ranging, breaking out or simply reacting to a headline?
Readers assessing leveraged products often focus on position sizing, risk limits and product disclosure before deciding whether the product is appropriate for them. The headlines will keep changing. The maths of risk management does not.
Disclaimer: This article is general information only and is intended for educational purposes. It explains common trading concepts and market behaviours and does not constitute financial product advice, a recommendation, or a trading signal. Any examples are illustrative only and do not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. CFDs are complex, leveraged products that carry a high level of risk. Before acting, consider the PDS and TMD and whether trading CFDs is appropriate for you. Seek independent advice if needed. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
If you have been following the tech story for the last decade, you have been trained to look at a very specific, very small patch of real estate in Northern California. But as we sit here in early 2026, the "connect-the-dots" moment for investors is this: the AI trade has stopped being about shiny software demos in Palo Alto and has started being about the physical industrialisation of compute.
We have entered the "Year of Proof". The world’s largest companies, the hyperscalers, are projected to spend a staggering US$650 billion on capital expenditures this year. But here’s the part most people miss: that money is not staying in Silicon Valley. It’s flowing to the "picks and shovels" players in Idaho, Washington, Colorado and even overseas.
If you want to understand where the actual return on investment (ROI) may be landing this earnings season, you have to look outside the 650 area code. The shift from AI hype to AI industrialisation is changing the map.
The full AI stack: from capex to consulting — GO Markets
Five companies · AI infrastructure play · 2026
The full AI stack: from capex to consulting
Infrastructure builders compared to the implementation bridge across the AI value chain
Note: Hyperscalers shown as 2026 CapEx spend. Accenture shown as cumulative advanced AI bookings ($11.5B through Q1 FY2026), reflecting its role as the adoption layer rather than the infrastructure layer.
Infrastructure (2026 CapEx projected)Implementation bridge (cumulative AI bookings)
Hyperscaler CapEx: Early 2026 analyst estimates, midpoint of ranges. Amazon approx. 100% YoY, Alphabet approx. 100%, Meta approx. 87%, Microsoft approx. 50%.
Accenture: Cumulative advanced AI bookings $11.5B through Q1 FY2026. Q1 AI bookings $2.2B (up 76% YoY), AI revenue $1.1B (up 120% YoY) across 1,300+ clients.
Five companies shaping the next phase of AI
Micron Technology (MU), Boise, Idaho
Micron is the "memory backbone" of the current cycle. While everyone was watching the chip designers, many overlooked the fact that AI chips are far less useful without high-bandwidth memory (HBM). Micron is currently viewed by some analysts as a strong buy because its capacity is reportedly sold out through the end of 2026. Analysts are also eyeing a 457% jump in earnings per share (EPS) as the memory cycle reaches what some describe as a robust peak.
Microsoft (MSFT), Redmond, Washington
Microsoft is the enterprise backbone of this transition. It has moved beyond simple chatbots and is now building what analysts call "Intelligence Factories". While the stock has faced pressure recently over capacity constraints, underlying demand for Azure AI is reportedly still running ahead of capacity. The broader bull case is that Microsoft is moving into "Agentic AI", systems that do not just talk to users but may also execute multi-step business workflows.
Amazon is playing a long-term game of vertical integration. To reduce its reliance on expensive third-party hardware, it’s building its own AI chips in-house. Amazon Web Services (AWS) remains the primary driver of profitability, and the company is using its retail data to train specialised models that many Silicon Valley start-ups may struggle to replicate.
Palantir Technologies (PLTR), Denver, Colorado
If Micron provides the memory and Microsoft the platform, Palantir provides the "operating system" for the modern AI factory. The company has posted strong momentum, with US commercial sales recently growing 93% year over year. It’s often framed as a bridge between raw data and corporate profitability, which remains a key focus for investors in 2026.
Accenture (ACN), Dublin, Ireland
You cannot just "plug in" AI. Businesses often need to redesign processes around it, and that’s where Accenture comes in.
The company is viewed as an implementation bridge, with one analyst arguing that "GenAI needs Accenture" to move from pilot programs to production though the cautionary angle is that the AI story has not fully excited investors here yet because consulting revenue can take longer to show up than chip sales.
What could happen next?
The chart maps the three time horizons likely to shape the next phase of the AI industrialisation trade.
In the near term, markets are still reacting to chipmaker earnings, guidance, and any signs of capacity strain. Over the next month, attention shifts to the real-world inputs behind AI growth, especially power, financing, and infrastructure. By the 60-day window, the key question is whether AI spending is broadening into a wider market re-rating or running ahead of near-term returns.
Across all three periods, the focus is the same: proof. Investors are looking for signs that AI capital expenditure is translating into real demand for energy, land, and industrial capacity. That is why updates from companies tied to power and data centre buildout matter more than ever.
What could happen next — GO Markets
Scenario planning · March 2026
What could happen next
Three time horizons, three scenarios to watch across the AI industrialisation cycle
Next 2 weeks
Chipmaker reports
Possible
Market volatility continues as traders digest the latest reports from chipmakers like Micron
Upside scenario
"Bulletproof" guidance from remaining infrastructure names triggers a sector-wide relief rally
Watch for
Any mention of "capacity constraints" or "supply bottlenecks" in earnings calls
Next 30 days
Energy and rates
Possible
Focus shifts to "real economy" energy players like NextEra that power the data centres
Downside scenario
Rising oil prices from Middle East conflict act as a tax on tech margins, rotating into defensives
Action point
Monitor Fed language on rates. Higher for longer makes $650B capex bills far more expensive to finance
Next 60 days
The great dispersion
Possible
Market rewards companies with real AI revenue and punishes those still stuck in experimentation
Upside scenario
NextEra Energy (NEE) data centre announcements in late April/May trigger a utility renaissance rally
Downside scenario
An "air pocket" in profits occurs where debt-funded investment outpaces revenue gains
Watch
May reports from Texas Pacific Land (TPL) — is data centre land demand still "red hot"?
Action point
Review your portfolio for geographic diversity. The AI story is now a global power race
The psychological trap
The emotional trap many traders fall into right now is recency bias. You have seen NVIDIA and the "Magnificent 7" win for so long that it feels like they are the only way to play this. But the "obvious" trade is often the one that has already been priced in. Before acting, ask yourself: "Am I buying this stock because I understand its role in the physical AI supply chain, or because I’m afraid of missing the next leg of a rally that started two years ago?"
Disclaimer: This content is general information only and should not be relied on as personal financial advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial product. References to companies or themes, including AI-related stocks, are illustrative only. Share and derivative markets can move sharply, and concentrated sectors such as AI and technology may experience elevated volatility, valuation risk, and liquidity risk. If you trade derivatives such as CFDs, leverage can magnify both gains and losses. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Markets enter May with the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75%, the Fed having concluded its 28-29 April meeting, and the next decision not due until 16-17 June. Brent crude is trading near US$108 per barrel, with the IEA describing the ongoing Iran conflict as the largest energy supply shock on record as the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed.
The macro tension this month is straightforward but uncomfortable: an oil-driven inflation impulse landing into a labour market that surprised to the upside in March, while Q1 growth came in soft.
The Federal Reserve has revised its 2026 PCE inflation projection to 2.7% and continues to signal one cut this year, though the timing remains contested. With no FOMC scheduled in May, every high-impact release may carry more weight than usual into the June meeting.
Fed Funds Rate
3.50% to 3.75%
Next FOMC
16-17 June 2026
Brent Crude
~US$108
Key data events
6+ high-impact releases
Growth: business activity and demand
The growth picture entering May is mixed. The Q1 GDP advance estimate landed on 30 April, while softer retail sales and inventory data have made the demand picture harder to read.
ISM manufacturing has been a quieter source of optimism, with recent prints holding in expansionary territory. Energy costs and tariff effects are now the variables most likely to shape the next move in business activity.
Key dates (AEST)
02
May
ISM Manufacturing PMI (April)
Institute for Supply Management · 12:00 am AEST
High
06
May
ISM Services PMI (April)
Institute for Supply Management · 12:00 am AEST
Medium
15
May
Retail Sales (April)
US Census Bureau · 10:30 pm AEST
High
What markets look for
Whether manufacturing PMI holds above 50, with the prices paid sub-index giving a read on input cost pressure
Services PMI as a check on the larger share of the US economy, particularly employment and prices
Retail sales control group, which feeds into consumption forecasts
Any sign that sustained Brent crude above US$100 is starting to affect household spending
How this data may move markets
Scenario
Treasuries
USD
Equities
Activity data prints firmer
↑ Yields rise
↑ Firmer
Mixed - depends on valuation stretch
Activity data softens
↓ Yields fall
↓ Softer
Support if inflation cooperates
Labour: payrolls and employment data
The April Employment Situation is one of the most concentrated risk events of the month. March payrolls came in stronger than expected, while earlier data revisions left the trend less clear. April will help show whether the labour market is genuinely re-accelerating or simply absorbing seasonal noise.
Key dates (AEST)
06
May
Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS)
Bureau of Labor Statistics · 12:00 am AEST
Medium
06
May
ADP National Employment Report (April)
ADP Research Institute · 10:15 pm AEST
Medium
08
May
Employment Situation, April (NFP)
Bureau of Labor Statistics · 10:30 pm AEST
High
What markets may watch
Headline non-farm payrolls (NFP) and the size of any prior-month revisions
Average hourly earnings, with energy-driven cost pressure keeping wage growth in focus
Unemployment rate and labour force participation
Sector mix, including whether goods-producing payrolls show signs of disruption
Market sensitivities
Scenario
Treasuries
USD
Equities
Firm NFP/wage growth
↑ Yields rise
↑ Strength
Pressure on valuations
Soft NFP/weak print
↓ Yields fall
↓ Softer
Mixed - risk of growth scare
Inflation: CPI, PPI and PCE
April inflation lands as the most market-relevant data block of the month. The March consumer price index (CPI) rose 3.3% over the prior 12 months, with energy up 10.9% on the month and gasoline up 21.2%, accounting for almost three quarters of the headline increase. With Brent holding near US$105 to US$108 through the latter half of April, a further passthrough into the April CPI energy component looks plausible.
Core CPI and core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) remain the better read on underlying trend.
Key dates (AEST)
12
May
CPI (April)
Bureau of Labor Statistics · 10:30 pm AEST
High
15
May
Producer Price Index (PPI), April
Bureau of Labor Statistics · 10:30 pm AEST
Medium
29
May
Personal Income and Outlays/PCE (April)
Bureau of Economic Analysis · 10:30 pm AEST
High
What markets may watch
Headline CPI year on year, especially the gasoline component
Core CPI, including shelter, services excluding shelter and core goods
PPI as a read on producer-level passthrough from energy and tariffs
Core PCE, which remains the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge
Market sensitivities
Scenario
Treasuries
USD
Commodities
Inflation cools/surprises lower
↓ Yields fall
↓ Softer
Gold consolidation
Headline runs hot/core sticky
↑ Yields rise
↑ Strength
Gold supported on stagflation risk
Policy, trade and earnings
May has no FOMC meeting, so policy attention shifts to Fed speakers, the path of any leadership transition, and the dominant geopolitical backdrop. Chair Jerome Powell's term concludes around the middle of the month. President Donald Trump has nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair, with the Senate Banking Committee having held a confirmation hearing.
The Iran conflict, now in its ninth week, remains the single largest source of macro tail risk, with the Strait of Hormuz blockade and stalled US-Iran talks setting the tone for energy markets and broader risk appetite. Q1 earnings season is in its peak weeks, with peak weeks expected between 27 April and 15 May, and 7 May the most active reporting day.
What to monitor this month
Iran-US negotiations and the operational status of the Strait of Hormuz
Fed speakers and any change in tone between meetings
Q1 earnings, especially from retail, energy and cyclical names
Weekly EIA crude inventories
Any tariff-related announcements that may affect inflation expectations
Bottom line
May is not a quiet month just because there is no FOMC meeting. Payrolls, CPI, PPI, retail sales and PCE all land before the June policy decision, while oil remains the dominant external shock.
For markets, the key question is whether the data points to a temporary energy-driven inflation lift, or a broader inflation problem arriving at the same time as softer growth. That distinction may shape the next major move in bonds, the US dollar, gold and equity indices.
Asia-Pacific markets start May with a more complicated macro backdrop than earlier in 2026. Regional growth has shown resilience, but higher energy prices are testing inflation expectations, trade balances and policy flexibility across fuel-importing economies.
For traders, the month's focus is likely to sit across three linked areas.
China Focus
Activity data
April CPI, PPI and purchasing managers' index (PMI)
Japan Focus
BOJ signals
Corporate goods prices and April CPI
Australia Focus
RBA decision
Statement on Monetary Policy and April CPI
Main Regional Risk
Energy volatility
Trade-sensitive sentiment
China
China remains central to the May Asia-Pacific market drivers outlook because its data can influence commodity demand, regional equities and the Australian dollar. The April data round may help traders assess whether the early-year recovery is broadening or still reliant on production, exports and policy support.
Key Dates (AEST)
30
Apr
Official PMI
National Bureau of Statistics · 11:30 am AEST
Medium
11
May
CPI and industrial producer price index (PPI)
National Bureau of Statistics · 11:30 am AEST
High
18
May
April activity data
Industrial production, retail and property · 12:00 pm AEST
High
27
May
Industrial economic benefits
National Bureau of Statistics · 11:30 am AEST
Medium
What markets may look for
Whether CPI data suggest demand-led inflation or continued subdued household pricing power
Whether PPI data point to improving factory margins or cost pressure from energy and raw materials
Whether retail sales show a firmer household sector or continued reliance on production and exports
Whether property data continue to weigh on confidence, construction demand and local government revenue
Why China matters for the region
China data can influence sentiment toward Asian equities, iron ore, copper, energy markets and the Australian dollar. Stronger domestic demand may support commodity-linked sentiment, while softer retail or property figures may keep markets focused on policy support and downside growth risks.
Japan inflation and BOJ signals
Japan's May calendar is less about a fresh BOJ rate decision and more about how markets interpret the April policy meeting, inflation data and wage-sensitive price trends. That matters because Japanese government bond yields and the yen remain sensitive to any shift in policy normalisation expectations.
Key Dates (AEST)
07
May
Minutes of the March BOJ meeting
Bank of Japan · 8:50 am AEST
Medium
12
May
Summary of Opinions – April BOJ meeting
Most market-sensitive Japan event · 9:50 am AEST
High
15
May
Corporate goods price index
Tracks input cost inflation · 9:50 am AEST
Medium
22
May
National April CPI
Statistics Bureau · 9:30 am AEST
High
29
May
Tokyo May CPI
Leading indicator for national trends · 9:30 am AEST
High
What markets may look for
Whether the BOJ still sees conditions for gradual policy normalisation, or whether energy-driven inflation complicates the outlook.
Whether goods and services inflation remain consistent with the 2% inflation objective.
Whether corporate goods prices reflect energy cost pass-through into producer pricing.
Whether Tokyo CPI points to firm or easing near-term price pressure ahead of the June meeting.
Why Japan matters
Japan’s data can influence yen volatility, Japanese government bond yields and the Nikkei 225. A stronger inflation pulse may support expectations for tighter policy over time, but energy-driven inflation can also pressure households and corporate margins. That balance may keep yen and equity reactions data-dependent.
Australia and the RBA decision
Australia has one of the clearest domestic policy events in the region in May. The RBA's Monetary Policy Board meets on 4 and 5 May, with the decision statement and Statement on Monetary Policy due at 2:30 pm AEST on 5 May. The Governor's media conference follows at 3:30 pm AEST.
Key Dates (AEST)
29
Apr
March CPI
Final read before RBA decision · 11:30 am AEST
High
05
May
RBA decision and Statement on Monetary Policy
Key domestic volatility event · 2:30 pm AEST
High
19
May
Minutes of the May RBA meeting
Reserve Bank of Australia · 11:30 am AEST
Medium
27
May
April CPI
First read on energy pass-through · 11:30 am AEST
High
What markets may look for
Whether the RBA gives more weight to inflation persistence or household demand risks in its decision statement.
Whether the Statement on Monetary Policy adjusts inflation, growth or labour market assumptions from the February update.
Whether April CPI confirms or challenges the inflation narrative after the May decision.
Whether labour conditions remain firm enough, with unemployment at 4.3% in March, to keep services inflation in focus.
Why Australia matters
Australia’s May data may influence AUD/USD, ASX 200 rate-sensitive sectors and short-end bond yields. A firmer inflation profile could support expectations for a restrictive RBA stance, while softer activity or household signals may limit how far markets price additional tightening. For index CFDs and forex CFDs, this is the highest-signal domestic event of the month.
Regional swing factors
Energy remains the main cross-market risk for May. Higher oil and gas prices can lift inflation, widen trade gaps and reduce policy space, particularly for economies dependent on imported fuel such as Japan, South Korea and parts of South-East Asia.
Regional themes to watch
ASEAN purchasing managers' index releases may indicate whether manufacturing momentum is broadening or losing speed. The Australian dollar, New Zealand dollar and Asian FX may remain sensitive to China data and global risk appetite. Iron ore and energy prices may influence Australia and China-linked equities. The RBA, BOJ and People's Bank of China face different inflation and growth trade-offs, and energy supply concerns may continue to shape inflation expectations and risk sentiment across the region.
Key watchlist
01
Top China Data Point
18 May activity data, particularly retail sales and property indicators
02
Top Japan Event
12 May BOJ Summary of Opinions from the April meeting
03
Top Australia Event
5 May RBA decision and Statement on Monetary Policy
04
Main Regional Wildcard
Energy price volatility linked to Middle East developments
05
Most Sensitive Market
AUD/USD, given its link to China demand and RBA repricing risk
06
Key Condition Shift
Evidence that inflation pressure is becoming persistent rather than mainly energy-led
Bottom Line
May’s Asia-Pacific calendar gives markets several points to reassess the region’s inflation, growth and policy mix. China data may shape commodity and risk sentiment, while Japan’s inflation signals and the RBA decision will guide rate pricing.
Energy remains the primary regional risk. If inflation pressure appears more persistent rather than energy-led, markets will become increasingly sensitive to central bank communication and yield repricing.
ASIA SESSION IN FOCUS
Watching Asia-Pacific moves today?
Track Asia-Pacific themes and monitor moves as they unfold.
As we enter May 2026, the global FX market is attempting a difficult high-wire act. April was defined by "civilisation-ending" ultimatums and a Pakistani-brokered ceasefire that sent Brent crude on a rollercoaster from US$110 down to the mid-US$90s.
For traders, the connect-the-dots moment is this: the peak panic around the Iran conflict has faded, but it has been replaced by a structural regime shift. Markets may be moving from a war premium to a transition premium.
With Kevin Warsh nominated to take the Fed chair in mid-May and the Bank of Japan (BOJ) staring down a generational ceiling near 160.00, the calm in the headlines may be masking a major repricing of global yield differentials.
DXY context
Holding near 100.00 on the “Warsh hawk” floor
Strongest currency
USD, supported by safe-haven demand and yield advantage
Weakest currency
JPY, pressured by the rate gap and energy import exposure
Main central bank theme
The hawkish hold and Fed leadership transition
Main catalyst ahead
RBA (5 May) and US Non-Farm Payrolls (8 May)
Monthly leaderboard — biggest movers
01USD
Rose sharply on safe-haven demand and higher for longer yield expectations.
Strongest
02CHF
Advanced strongly as the preferred European refuge from Middle East risk.
Safe Haven
03AUD
Mixed; caught between domestic energy inflation and a hawkish RBA.
Mixed
04NZD
Under pressure; yield gap and capital outflows remains the primary narrative.
Down
05JPY
Fell to 20-month lows; pressured by the widening rate gap and energy import costs.
Weakest
Strongest mover: US dollar (USD)
The US dollar enters May with a new kind of ballast. While the ceasefire reduced the immediate need for a panic hedge, the nomination of Kevin Warsh, widely viewed as an inflation hawk, has provided a structural floor for the greenback.
Markets may be front-running a shift in Fed independence alongside a stricter approach to inflation targeting. That combination - a credible hawkish signal at the policy level - tends to support the dollar even when the near-term data is mixed.
Key drivers
The Warsh effect:
Markets may be front-running a shift in Fed independence and a stricter approach to inflation targeting.
Energy insulation:
As a net exporter, the US may be better cushioned against any fragile ceasefire-related flare-ups in oil than Europe or Japan.
Yield floor:
The federal funds rate at 3.50% to 3.75% remains a potential magnet for global capital.
What markets are watching next
Traders are watching the 101 level on the DXY. A sustained break above this high-volume area could signal a restart of the primary uptrend and a softer-than-expected US non-farm payrolls report on 8 May may challenge that view.
Weakest mover: Japanese yen (JPY)
If you wanted to design a currency to struggle in 2026, the yen fits the brief. Despite the "TACO" script, short for "Trump always chickens out", providing some relief to equities, the mathematical pressure on JPY remains significant.
The BOJ continues its delicate exit from long-term stimulus, but this process has been slower than many anticipated. The USD/JPY pair remains particularly sensitive to US Treasury yields. A move above 4.5% on the US 10-year could put additional pressure on the BOJ to act.
Key drivers
The yield chasm:
Even if the BOJ hikes to 1.00%, the spread against the US dollar would remain around 275 basis points (bps), which may keep the carry trade attractive.
Import vulnerability:
Japan’s heavy reliance on Middle East oil means energy costs may continue to weigh on its current account, even with oil near US$93.
Intervention fatigue:
Finance Minister Katayama has warned of “bold action”, but past interventions in 2022 and 2024 have tended to provide only short-lived relief.
Strategic outlook
USD/JPY is sitting near 159.80. The generational ceiling around 160.40, reportedly not breached in 35 years, remains the key battleground.
The pair to watch: AUD/USD
The Australian dollar sits at an interesting intersection.
Inflation in Australia has proven more persistent than in other developed economies, which may encourage the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) to maintain a cautious, higher-for-longer stance. This could create potential yield support for the AUD that does not exist in the same way for currencies where central banks are already cutting.
What could support the AUD
At the same time, the AUD remains deeply exposed to commodity markets and Chinese demand.
Iron ore and copper are critical inputs for the Australian economy. If global demand remains stable, the Australian dollar could find further support. Any shift in Chinese industrial data will be a key signal for this pair.
The EUR/USD comparison
The EUR/USD dynamic also warrants attention.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is balancing a cooling economy with regional inflation targets. Growth in Germany remains a concern for the eurozone, and markets are pricing in a potential rate cut that could narrow the interest rate differential with the US.
That shift may cause the euro to soften relative to the US dollar. Political developments within the European Union, particularly any fiscal disagreement, could add to volatility in that pair.
Data to watch next
Four events stand out as the clearest catalysts. Each has a direct transmission channel into rate expectations and, by extension, into forex CFDs.
Key dates and FX sensitivity
05
May
RBA Policy Decision
AUD pairs, ASX 200 · 02.30 pm AEST
Markets are pricing a 74% chance of a hike to 4.35% as domestic inflation remains persistent. The outcome may shape AUD direction over the following weeks.
08
May
US Labour Market (NFP)
USD pairs, Gold · 10:30 pm AEST
A second consecutive miss could create an uncomfortable narrative for the new Fed leadership transition. The NFP report provides the clearest picture of US labour market health.
12
May
US consumer price index (CPI), April
USD/JPY, EUR/USD · 10:30 pm AEST
The first clear read on whether the April oil price spike has flowed into core services and sticky inflation. It may influence the Fed’s tone for the remainder of the quarter.
20
May
NVIDIA Q1 Earnings
US Tech, AI Infrastructure · Morning AEST
A key pulse check for the AI infrastructure “invoice phase” and broader risk-on sentiment. It may influence risk-correlated currencies, including AUD and NZD.
Key levels and signals
◆
USD/JPY 160.00
A possible line in the sand for Ministry of Finance intervention. Actual or threatened action here has historically produced sharp reversals in the pair.
◆
AUD/USD 0.7000
A psychological handle that acted as a heavy pivot during the 2025 trade war; remains a near-term directional reference for positioning.
◆
Brent crude US$92.13
Technical resistance where a break lower could confirm the geopolitical floor has weakened, potentially easing pressure on importers.
◆
US 10-year yield 4.5%
A break above this level could create significant valuation pressure for growth-linked FX pairs and emerging market assets.
Bottom line
The FX moves heading into May are being shaped by a normalisation trap. Traders may be betting that the worst of the energy shock is over but a hawkish Fed leadership transition could still re-steepen the yield curve.
Moves are likely to remain highly data-dependent and sensitive to overnight gaps from the Middle East, where geopolitical shifts can gap markets before the next session opens.
The FX market heading into May is being shaped by a normalisation trap. Traders may be betting that the worst of the energy shock is over, but a hawkish Fed leadership transition could still re-steepen the yield curve. Moves are likely to remain highly data-dependent and sensitive to overnight gaps from the Middle East, where geopolitical shifts can gap markets before the next session opens.
Asia-Pacific Coverage
Follow FX through the Asia session
Stay close to Asia-Pacific themes, regional data, sentiment and key crosses.