Without any doubt it was a difficult year for the stock markets. Recently nearly all equity indices have erased their 2018 gains. October has also lived up to its reputation in being the worst month for equities.
The stock markets bled red, and investors were anxious and cautious. The equity markets have gone through their longest bull run, and markets participants were only expecting a correction of 10% at some point. However, the recent massive sell-off prompted increased fears as the markets were navigating into a sea of headwinds, with growing concerns that it is more than just the markets correcting themselves.
Has Jerome Powell emerged as the saviour? The policy divergence between the US and the other major central banks was the dominant driver that had altered the spectrum of the buoyancy in the markets at the beginning of the year. A hawkish Fed prevented the equity markets to outperform in 2018.
A sudden dovish shift whereby a few Fed officers appeared to be less hawkish has captured the markets’ attention. Chairman of the he Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell’s comments were the trigger: “ interest rates are close to neutral ” compared to “interest rates are a long way from neutral” which were embraced by equity traders. Wall Street slowly moved into green again as the possibility of fewer rate hikes boosted equity benchmarks: The Dow Jones Average Industrial surged by 600 points to close at 25,366.43 S&P500 jumped by 2.3% to finish at 2,743.79 Nasdaq Composite advanced by 2.95% to end at 7,291.59 Jerome Powell appears to have just put a floor under stocks!
Source: Bloomberg Is the renewed optimism justified? It would make sense to say “yes” as the Fed risk has resolved itself and now the markets have “one less” headwind to think about. When the markets dropped as much as 10%, such dovish news is deemed favourable as it plays an essential part to the bottoming process.
However, while the change in language does indicate “dovishness” and be the reason for the market to cheer up, the price action might be exaggerated or could lose steam as trade tariffs with China is far from resolved even though there is more optimism regarding trade negotiations. The stock markets are still fragile and vulnerable to: Peaked earnings Slow growth in China Reduction in global demand Brexit jitters The rout in oil markets Regulatory measures We have also seen that technology investors had a rough two months having witnessed the FAANG group wiping off $1 trillion in market value. Fundamental and external risks have forced investors to stop and think.
Apple shares fell in a bear market territory shaking up the technology sector this month. Being the bellwether of technology stocks, the rout in Apple shares over the decrease in iPhone sales put downward pressure Wall Street. Apple erased $190 billion in five weeks and it lost its $US1 trillion valuation.
Trump tariffs threat on iPhones did little to help Apple in staging a recovery. Source: Bloomberg If it were not for the relief bounce in late November, Amazon was down by 21% since the first of October losing $200 billion market cap at some point. Fundamentals are not flashing red signals that justified such a massive sell-off.
The stock’s recent decline may be an overreaction, but it appears that fears were elevated after the disappointing revenue forecasts. Source: Bloomberg Other big stocks in the FAANG group are facing regulatory headwinds and concerns over the valuations of such big names. Regulation has just started to come down on companies and will likely get tougher.
These highflying stocks have grown so large that institutional investors are wary to go back to that overweight position. Are investors seeking more large-cap value over large gap growth? Overall, the equity markets were mostly hit by two major headwinds: Higher rates and Trade tariffs.
Now that Powell cleared investor’s doubts regarding interest rate. The attention now moves to the G20 summit. Traders are contemplating different scenarios on how the summit will unfold.
The most likely situation given the conflicting news from the White House will be that: Both parties will announce some kind of negotiation to somewhat calm the markets, but the US will most probably increase tariffs as expected. Whether the Stock Market will end in the green or still be flashing red, it may very well depend on President Trump.
By
GO Markets
The information provided is of general nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situations or needs. Before acting on any information provided, you should consider whether the information is suitable for you and your personal circumstances and if necessary, seek appropriate professional advice. All opinions, conclusions, forecasts or recommendations are reasonably held at the time of compilation but are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Go Markets Pty Ltd, ABN 85 081 864 039, AFSL 254963 is a CFD issuer, and trading carries significant risks and is not suitable for everyone. You do not own or have any interest in the rights to the underlying assets. You should consider the appropriateness by reviewing our TMD, FSG, PDS and other CFD legal documents to ensure you understand the risks before you invest in CFDs.
As ações de defesa da ASX estão de volta em mais listas de observação e, de acordo com o Instituto Internacional de Pesquisa da Paz de Estocolmo (SIPRI), os gastos militares globais atingiram aproximadamente USD 2,718 trilhões em 2024, um aumento de 9,4% em termos reais.
As configurações atuais de defesa da Austrália estão definidas na Estratégia Nacional de Defesa de 2024 e nos documentos de planejamento de investimento relacionados, que descrevem as prioridades de financiamento de capacidades de longo prazo. Além disso, Canberra apontou um investimento de capacidade de 330 bilhões de dólares australianos até 2034, incluindo financiamento adicional para combatentes de superfície, preparação, ataques de longo alcance e sistemas autônomos.
Aqui está a parte que a maioria das pessoas perde: nem todas as ações de defesa da ASX são negociadas da mesma forma. Alguns ficam perto da construção naval. Alguns são nomes de contra-drones e alguns são operadores menores e de alto risco, onde um contrato pode importar muito mais do que o mercado supõe.
Esses cinco nomes não são uma lista de compras, mas sim uma lista prática para investidores que tentam entender onde o impulso de compras pode realmente aparecer no ASX.
1) Austal (ASX: ASB)
A Austal é uma das empresas listadas na ASX mais diretamente expostas ao gasoduto de construção naval da Austrália, embora a execução do contrato, as margens e o prazo de entrega continuem sendo variáveis importantes.
Eles não estão apenas ganhando contratos aleatórios; eles assinaram um grande acordo legal (o Acordo Estratégico de Construção Naval) que os torna parceiros oficiais para construir a próxima geração de navios militares de médio porte da Austrália na Austrália Ocidental.
Em fevereiro de 2026, o governo deu luz verde à Austal para um projeto de 4 bilhões de dólares. Isso não é para apenas um navio, é para 8 navios “Landing Craft Heavy”. São enormes navios de transporte (cerca de 100 metros de comprimento) projetados para transportar tanques pesados e equipamentos diretamente para a praia. Mas aqui está a parte que a maioria das pessoas perde: a construção naval é uma maratona, não um sprint.
Como você pode ver no cronograma de entrega, embora a construção comece em 2026, o navio final não será entregue até 2038. Para um investidor, isso significa que a Austal tem um fluxo de renda “garantido” para os próximos 12 anos, mas ele precisa ser muito bom em gerenciar seus custos durante esse longo período para realmente obter lucro.
2) DroneShield (ASX: DRO)
Se você já viu imagens de pequenos drones interrompendo campos de batalha modernos, o DroneShield está construindo parte do “botão de desligamento”. Seu foco é a tecnologia de combate a drones, incluindo sistemas que detectam, interrompem ou derrotam drones usando guerra eletrônica, sensores e ferramentas baseadas em software, em vez de depender apenas de munições tradicionais.
No início de 2026, a DroneShield deixou de ser uma startup promissora e entrou em uma fase comercial muito maior. Ela registrou uma receita do ano fiscal de 2025 de A $216,5 milhões, um aumento de 276% em relação ao ano fiscal de 2024, e disse que iniciou o ano fiscal de 2026 com A $103,5 milhões em receita comprometida.
Um ponto que o mercado pode ignorar é a camada de software no modelo. A DroneShield registrou receita de A $11,6 milhões em software como serviço (SaaS) no ano fiscal de 2025 e disse que está trabalhando para que o SaaS represente 30% da receita em cinco anos. Seu modelo de assinatura inclui atualizações de software para sistemas implantados, o que adiciona um fluxo crescente de receita recorrente junto com as vendas de hardware.
Entre as ações de defesa da ASX, a DroneShield é uma das formas mais diretas de seguir o tema Counter-UAS. É também um dos nomes em que o sentimento pode oscilar rapidamente, porque as histórias de crescimento podem aumentar e diminuir quando o tempo do pedido muda.
A EOS constrói tanto o “cérebro” quanto o “músculo” para plataformas militares. É mais conhecido por sistemas de armas remotas, que permitem aos operadores controlar torres armadas de dentro de veículos protegidos, e por sistemas de laser de alta energia voltados para a defesa contra drones. A EOS disse que seu acúmulo incondicional atingiu cerca de A $459,1 milhões no início de 2026, após uma série de vitórias de contratos até 2025. Isso aponta para uma base muito maior de trabalho seguro, embora o tempo de entrega e a conversão de receita ainda sejam importantes.
A EOS assinou um contrato de €71,4 milhões, cerca de A $125 milhões, com um cliente europeu para um sistema de armas a laser de alta energia de 100 quilowatts. A EOS afirma que o sistema foi projetado para um baixo custo por tiro e pode acionar até 20 drones por minuto. O governo australiano reservou A $1,3 bilhão em 10 anos para a aquisição de capacidade de combate a drones, e a EOS divulgou que fez parte de uma equipe bem-sucedida de licitação do LAND 156. Isso não garante receita futura, mas dá suporte à visibilidade de médio prazo em um mercado que a empresa já tem como alvo.
A EOS parece uma história de recuperação, mas que ainda depende da execução. A empresa se reorientou em torno de sistemas de armas remotas, sistemas de combate a drones e lasers, todas áreas vinculadas a maiores gastos com defesa. A questão principal é se ela pode continuar convertendo o acúmulo e o pipeline em receita gerada e, ao mesmo tempo, manter a disciplina do balanço patrimonial.
4) Codan (ASX: CDA)
Às vezes, a Codan fica de fora das listas casuais de ações de defesa porque é mais diversificada. Isso pode ser um descuido. Em seus resultados do primeiro semestre do ano fiscal de 26, a Codan disse que sua empresa de comunicações projeta comunicações de missão crítica para os mercados globais de segurança pública e militar. A receita de comunicações aumentou 19% para A $221,8 milhões. A empresa também disse que a DTC gerou um forte crescimento da demanda de defesa e sistemas não tripulados, com a receita de sistemas não tripulados aumentando 68%, para A $73 milhões. Codan disse que cerca de metade dessa receita não tripulada estava vinculada a aplicações de defesa operacional em zonas de conflito.
É aqui que a história se torna mais matizada. Em uma cesta de ações de defesa da ASX, a Codan pode oferecer um perfil diferente, com menos sensibilidade pura às manchetes, maior diversificação operacional e exposição significativa a comunicações militares e sistemas não tripulados, sem ser um nome de tema único. Essa diversificação também pode significar que as ações nem sempre são negociadas como um nome de defesa puro.
A HighCom está no final especulativo desta lista e deve ser rotulada dessa forma. A empresa afirma que seus dois negócios contínuos são a HighCom Armor, que fornece proteção balística, e a HighCom Technology, que fornece e mantém sistemas aéreos não tripulados de pequeno e médio porte, sistemas aéreos contra-não tripulados e suporte relacionado de engenharia, integração, manutenção e logística para o ADF e outras forças armadas regionais alinhadas.
No primeiro semestre do ano fiscal de 26, a receita de operações contínuas caiu 59% para A $10,9 milhões, enquanto o EBITDA passou para uma perda de A $5,4 milhões em relação ao lucro de A $1,9 milhão no ano anterior. A HighCom também divulgou A $5,1 milhões em receita de tecnologia HighCom, incluindo A $3,5 milhões de peças de reposição para pequenos sistemas aéreos não tripulados (SUAS) e A $1,6 milhão de serviços de sustentação fornecidos ao Departamento de Defesa da Austrália.
Então, sim, a HighCom é uma das ações de defesa ASX mais sensíveis financeiramente no conselho. Mas também é o tipo de nome menor que pode mostrar como as compras se transformam em equipamentos de suporte, sustentação e proteção especializados.
Principais observações do mercado
Acompanhe os marcos do programa, não apenas as manchetes políticas. A adjudicação de contratos, o início da fabricação, os cronogramas de entrega e o trabalho de manutenção geralmente importam mais do que um único dia de anúncio.
Separe a exposição pura da exposição diversificada. O DroneShield e o EOS estão mais próximos de temas concentrados de tecnologia de defesa, enquanto o Codan traz exposição às comunicações em um mix de negócios mais amplo.
Assista aos temas de capacidade soberana na Austrália. A Austal e a EOS estão vinculadas à fabricação local, à integração e às cadeias de suprimentos australianas, o que apóia o tema mais amplo de capacidade soberana desse grupo.
Preste atenção aos balanços e à conversão de caixa. O ímpeto de compras pode ser real mesmo quando o tempo fica confuso. A última metade da HighCom é um lembrete disso.
As manchetes de defesa podem parecer imediatas. Os ganhos geralmente não são. O principal trabalho naval da Austal se estende até a próxima década. Os contratos EOS são entregues ao longo de vários anos. O fluxo de pedidos da DroneShield parece forte, mas a empresa ainda separa a receita comprometida de uma oportunidade mais ampla de pipeline. HighCom mostra o outro lado da moeda. A exposição à aquisição não se traduz automaticamente em uma execução financeira tranquila.
As referências a ações de defesa listadas na ASX são apenas informações gerais, não uma recomendação para comprar, vender ou manter qualquer título ou CFD. Essas ações podem ser altamente voláteis e sensíveis ao prazo do contrato, à política governamental, à geopolítica, ao risco de execução e às condições do mercado. Expectativas de backlog, pipeline e receita não são garantias de desempenho futuro.
Em 28 de fevereiro de 2026, quando o ataque conjunto dos EUA e Israel começou, os números nas telas começaram a se mover de uma forma que parecia clínica, mesmo quando a realidade no terreno, com as trágicas mortes de vítimas civis no Irã, parecia tudo menos isso. Os mercados, como dizem, não têm uma bússola moral, mas sim uma máquina de pesagem e, neste momento, estão avaliando a transição de toda a economia global de um modelo “just-in-time” para um ciclo “just-in-case”.
O que os mercados estavam sinalizando
Em 2 de março, a fita de índice permaneceu cautelosa enquanto a defesa aumentava. Historicamente, os conflitos podem acelerar o reabastecimento e os pedidos, mas o tamanho (e a rapidez) ainda depende de orçamentos, aprovações e gargalos de entrega.
Os vencedores
1. Hanwha Aerospace (012450.KS)
Hanwha é um dos nomes mais negociados vinculados ao tema “K-Defense”, uma empresa cada vez mais vista pelo mercado como fornecedora escalável de um ciclo global cada vez mais apertado de artilharia e munições. Capacidade e credibilidade de entrega.
Quando o reabastecimento se torna urgente, a capacidade de produzir em grande escala geralmente é tão importante quanto a própria plataforma. A demanda de exportação vinculada a sistemas como o K9 Thunder e o Chunmoo reforçou a narrativa de um fluxo de pedidos durável, mesmo quando os resultados ainda dependem de orçamentos, aprovações e prazos de entrega.
Principais coisas que podem mover o sentimento: atualizações do livro de pedidos, ritmo de produção e quaisquer anúncios de exportação subsequentes.
2. Northrop Grumman (NOC)
A Northrop se concentrou à medida que os investidores reavaliaram a exposição à modernização estratégica e a grandes programas de longa duração. Os mercados de defesa, muitas vezes vistos como essenciais, podem persistir em todos os ciclos. É menos sobre um quarto e mais sobre se o ímpeto permanece estável se as prioridades de modernização permanecerem em vigor (e se os cronogramas mudam se não mudarem).
Variáveis-chave que podem mover o sentimento: Ritmo de aquisição, prazo do contrato e linguagem de financiamento relacionada ao programa.
3. Corporação RTX (RTX)
O RTX voltou ao centro da fita quando os investidores avaliaram um ciclo de reabastecimento de interceptores e a economia da defesa aérea de alto ritmo. O desgaste é caro e, quando as taxas de uso aumentam, os governos normalmente precisam reabastecer os estoques e, em muitos casos, financiar a expansão da produção, o que pode aumentar o atraso e aumentar a visibilidade da receita.
Variáveis-chave que podem mover o sentimento: Pedidos de reabastecimento, indicadores de expansão da fabricação e produtividade de entrega.
4. Lockheed Martin (LMT)
A Lockheed chamou a atenção quando os mercados se concentraram na demanda por defesa antimísseis e na questão que cada mesa de compras enfrenta em um ambiente de alto ritmo: com que rapidez os estoques podem ser reconstruídos? Se a utilização permanecer elevada, os vencedores tendem a ser os empreiteiros mais bem posicionados para escalar a produção e entregar de forma confiável. A exposição à defesa antimísseis da Lockheed a mantém intimamente ligada a essa narrativa de reabastecimento.
Variáveis-chave que podem mover o sentimento: sinais de rampa de produção, economia unitária e cadência de pedidos orientada pelo orçamento.
5. Sistemas BAE (BA.L)
Com um acúmulo de 83,6 bilhões de libras e um papel central no programa submarino AUKUS, a BAE entrou em foco quando partes da Europa sinalizaram maiores ambições de gastos com defesa. As ações subiram 6,11% para uma alta de 52 semanas em meio a uma rotação “sem risco”, com os comerciantes observando os marcos do AUKUS e as aquisições europeias de defesa aérea e antimísseis, incluindo o “Sky Shield”.
Variáveis-chave que podem mover o sentimento: Um potencial catalisador é qualquer aumento claro nos gastos alemães que eleve o fluxo de pedidos nas unidades europeias da BAE, enquanto os principais riscos incluem um forte aumento nos rendimentos do ouro do Reino Unido, uma nova volatilidade da libra esterlina ou uma “ameaça de paz” na obtenção de lucros.
800
Os perdedores: nem todo 'estoque de guerra' sobe
6. Ambiente aeroportuário (AVAV)
A AeroVironment subiu 18% na abertura antes de cair 17% no período intradiário após relatos de que a Força Espacial dos EUA estava reabrindo um contrato de USD 1,4 bilhão. A medida destaca como os processos de aquisição e o risco do contrato podem impulsionar a volatilidade, mesmo em ambientes temáticos favoráveis.
7. Defesa de Kratos (KTOS)
Kratos aborda o tema de drones e munições vadiadoras, que ganhou atenção à medida que o conflito no Oriente Médio se intensificava. As ações ainda foram vendidas após os lucros, destacando um risco comum do setor de defesa. A Kratos anunciou uma grande oferta complementar de ações na faixa de USD 1,2 bilhão a USD 1,4 bilhão. A medida fortalece o balanço patrimonial e pode apoiar futuros investimentos em programas.
Para negociadores focados em narrativas de “prêmio de conflito” de curto prazo, a diluição pode alterar rapidamente a configuração. Mesmo quando as condições de demanda parecem favoráveis, o mercado pode reavaliar as ações se cada acionista finalmente possuir uma parte menor do negócio.
8. Máquinas intuitivas (LUNR)
Alguns nomes especulativos de tecnologia espacial ficaram para trás, pois os investidores pareciam favorecer empresas com receitas mais estabelecidas vinculadas à defesa.
9. Boeing (BA)
A Boeing caiu cerca de 2,5% na sessão. Embora sua divisão de defesa seja significativa, seus negócios comerciais podem ser mais sensíveis à demanda da aviação, às interrupções no espaço aéreo e às mudanças no preço do petróleo.
10. Spirit AeroSystems (SPR)
A Spirit AeroSystems permanece intimamente ligada ao ciclo global de produção de aeronaves como uma importante fornecedora de aeroestruturas.Resultados recentes mostraram perdas crescentes, apesar do aumento das vendas, refletindo os aumentos contínuos dos custos de produção nos principais programas de aeronaves. Essas pressões pesaram sobre a confiança dos investidores nas perspectivas de curto prazo. A aquisição planejada pela Boeing pode, em última análise, remodelar a posição da empresa na cadeia de suprimentos, mas o risco de execução e a estabilidade da produção permanecem fundamentais na forma como o mercado precifica as ações.
O que assistir a seguir
Escalação versus redução da escalada: Uma mudança em direção à diplomacia ou às discussões sobre o cessar-fogo pode mudar rapidamente o sentimento em relação às ações de defesa.
Petróleo e transporte marítimo: Os picos de energia podem restringir as condições financeiras e pressionar setores cíclicos.
Orçamentos e prêmios: Às vezes, os movimentos de preços podem preceder as decisões do contrato, com clareza chegando quando os prêmios são finalizados.
Capacidade de produção: Empresas com histórico comprovado de produção e entrega geralmente atraem a maior atenção dos investidores.
Restrições da cadeia de suprimentos: Terras raras, propulsão e eletrônicos continuam sendo possíveis gargalos que podem limitar a rapidez com que a produção cresce.
A lente de longo prazo
O conflito de 2026 no Irã é, antes de tudo, uma tragédia humana. Para os mercados, isso também pode representar uma mudança na forma como os gastos com segurança nacional são priorizados dentro das estruturas fiscais. Se os gastos com defesa permanecerem elevados em um horizonte de vários anos, empresas com capacidade de fabricação escalável e tecnologias integradas poderão atrair a atenção contínua dos investidores. Dito isso, os mercados se movem em ciclos. Os temas estruturais podem persistir, mas também podem ser reavaliados rapidamente quando as suposições mudam. Manter-se analítico e consciente dos riscos continua sendo fundamental.
As referências a empresas, setores ou movimentos de mercado específicos são fornecidas apenas para comentários gerais do mercado e não constituem uma recomendação, oferta ou solicitação para comprar ou vender qualquer produto financeiro. As reações do mercado a eventos geopolíticos ou macroeconômicos podem ser voláteis e imprevisíveis, e os resultados podem diferir materialmente das expectativas.
So FY24 earnings are now done and from what we can see the results have been on the whole slightly better than expected. The catch is the numbers that we've seen for early FY25 which suggested any momentum we had from 2024 may be gone. So here are 8 things that caught our attention from the earnings season just completed.
Resilient Economy and Earnings Performance Resilience surprises remain: The Australian economy has shown remarkable resilience despite higher inflation and overall global pessimism. The resilience was reflected in the ASX 300, which closed the reporting season with a net earnings beat of 3 percentage points - a solid beat of the Street's consensus. This beat was primarily driven by better-than-expected margins, indicating that companies are effectively managing cost pressures through flexes in wages, inventories and nonessential costs.
The small guy is falling by wayside: However, the reporting outside of the ASX 300 paints a completely different picture. Over 53 per cent of firms missed estimates, size cost efficiencies and other methods larger firms can take were unable to be matched by their smaller counterparts. The fall in the ex-ASX 300 stocks was probably missed by most as it represents a small fraction of the ASX.
But nonetheless it's important to highlight as it's likely that what was seen in FY24 in small cap stocks will probably spread up into the larger market. Season on season slowdown is gaining momentum Smaller Beats what also caught our attention is the three-percentage point beat of this earnings season is 4 percentage points less than the beat in February which saw a seven-percentage point upside. That trend has been like this now for three consecutive halves and it's probable it will continue into the first half of FY25.
The current outlook from the reporting season is a slowing cycle, reducing the likelihood of positive economic surprises and earnings upgrades. Dividend Trends Going Oprah - Dividend Surprises: Reporting season ended with dividend surprises that were more aligned with earnings surprises, with a modest DPS (Dividends Per Share) beat of 2 percentage points. This marked a significant improvement from the initial weeks of the reporting season when conservative payout strategies led to more dividend misses.
The stronger dividends toward the end of the season signal some confidence in the future outlook despite conservative guidance. However, firms that did have banked franking credits or capital in the bank from previous periods they went Oprah and handed out ‘special dividends’ like confetti. While this was met with shareholder glee, it does also suggest that firms cannot see opportunity to deploy this capital in the current conditions.
That reenforces the views from point 2. Winners and Losers - Performance Growth Stocks Outperform: Growth stocks emerged as the clear winners of the reporting season, with a net beat of 30 percentage points. This performance was driven by strong margin surprises and the best free cash flow (FCF) surprise among any group.
However, there was a slight miss on sales, which was more than offset by higher margins. Sectors like Technology and Health were key contributors to the outperformance of Growth stocks. Stand out performers were the likes of SQ2, HUB, and TPW.
Globally-exposed Cyclicals Underperform: Global Cyclicals were the most disappointing, led by falling margins and sales misses. The earnings misses were attributed to slowing global growth and the rising Australian Dollar. Despite these challenges, Global Cyclicals did follow the dividend trend surprised to the upside.
Contrarian view might be to consider Global Cyclicals with the possibility the AUD begins to fade on RBA rate cuts in 2025. Mixed Results in Other Sectors: Resources: Ended the season with an equal number of beats and misses. Margins were slightly better than expected, and there was a positive cash flow surprise for some companies.
However, the sector faced significant downgrades, with FY25 earnings now expected to fall by 3.2 per cent. Industrials: Delivered growth with a nine per cent upside in EPS increases, although slightly below expectations. Defensives drove most of this growth, insurers however such as QBE, SUN, and HLI were drags.
Banks: Banks received net upgrades for FY25 earnings due to delayed rate cuts and lower-than-expected bad debts. However, earnings are still forecasted to fall by around 3 per cent in FY25. Defensives: Had a challenging reporting season, with net misses on margins.
Several major defensive stocks missed expectations and faced downgrades for FY25, which led to negative share price reactions. Future Gazing - Guidance and Earnings Outlook Vigilant Guidance has caused downgrades: As expected, many companies used the reporting season to reset earnings expectations. About 40 per cent in fact provided forecasts below consensus expectations, which in turn led to earnings downgrades for FY25 from the Street.
This cautious approach reflects the uncertainty in the economic environment and the potential for slower growth ahead, which was reflected in the FY24 numbers. Flat Earnings Forecast for FY25: The initial expectation of approximately 10 per cent earnings growth for FY25 has completely evaporated to just 0.1 per cent growth (yes, you read that correctly). This revision includes adjustments for the treatment of CDIs like NEM, which reduced earnings by 2.8 percentage point, and negative revisions in response to weaker-than-expected results, guidance, and lower commodity prices.
Resources were particularly impacted, with a 7.7 percentage point downgrade, leading to a forecasted earnings decline of 2.8 percent for the sector. Gazing into FY26: Early projections for FY26 suggest a 1.3 percent decline in earnings, driven by the expected declines in Resources and Banks due to net interest margins and commodity prices. However, Industrials are currently projected to deliver a 10.4 percent EPS growth, would argue this seems optimistic given the slowing economic cycle.
The Consensus Downgrades to 2025 Earnings: The consensus for ASX 300 earnings in 2025 was downgraded by 3 per cent during the reporting season. This reflects a broad range of negative revisions, with 23 percent of stocks facing downgrades. Biggest losers were sectors like Energy, Media, Utilities, Mining, Health, and Capital Goods all saw significant consensus downgrades, with Media particularly facing downgrades as budgets are slashed in half.
Flip side Tech, Telecom, Banks, and Financial Services, saw aggregate earnings upgrades. Notably, 78 percent of the banking sector received upgrades, reflecting some resilience in this group. Cash Flow and Margin Surprises Positive Cash Flow: Operating cash flow was a positive surprise, with 2 percentage point increase for Industrial and Resource stocks reporting cash flow at least 10 per cent above expectations.
The main drivers of this cash flow surprise were lower-than-expected tax and interest costs, along with positive EBITDA margin surprises. Capex: There were slightly more companies with higher-than-expected capex, but the impact on overall Free Cash Flow (FCF) was modest. Significant positive FCF surprises were seen in companies like TLS, QAN, and BHP, while WES, CSL, and WOW had negative surprises.
Final nuts and bolts Seasonal Downgrade Patterns: The peak in downgrades typically occurs during the full-year reporting season, so the significant downgrades seen in August are not necessarily a negative signal for the market. As the year progresses, the pace of downgrades may slow, and there could be some positive guidance surprises during the 2024 AGM season. However, with a slowing economic cycle, the likelihood of positive surprises is lower compared to 2023.
Overall, the reporting season highlighted the resilience of the Australian economy and the challenges facing certain sectors. While Growth stocks outperformed, the outlook for FY25 remains cautious with flat earnings growth and sector-specific headwinds. Investors will need to navigate a mixed landscape with potential opportunities in contrarian plays like Global Cyclicals, but also be mindful of the broader economic uncertainties.
Markets enter May with the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75%, the Fed having concluded its 28-29 April meeting, and the next decision not due until 16-17 June. Brent crude is trading near US$108 per barrel, with the IEA describing the ongoing Iran conflict as the largest energy supply shock on record as the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed.
The macro tension this month is straightforward but uncomfortable: an oil-driven inflation impulse landing into a labour market that surprised to the upside in March, while Q1 growth came in soft.
The Federal Reserve has revised its 2026 PCE inflation projection to 2.7% and continues to signal one cut this year, though the timing remains contested. With no FOMC scheduled in May, every high-impact release may carry more weight than usual into the June meeting.
Fed Funds Rate
3.50% to 3.75%
Next FOMC
16-17 June 2026
Brent Crude
~US$108
Key data events
6+ high-impact releases
Growth: business activity and demand
The growth picture entering May is mixed. The Q1 GDP advance estimate landed on 30 April, while softer retail sales and inventory data have made the demand picture harder to read.
ISM manufacturing has been a quieter source of optimism, with recent prints holding in expansionary territory. Energy costs and tariff effects are now the variables most likely to shape the next move in business activity.
Key dates (AEST)
02
May
ISM Manufacturing PMI (April)
Institute for Supply Management · 12:00 am AEST
High
06
May
ISM Services PMI (April)
Institute for Supply Management · 12:00 am AEST
Medium
15
May
Retail Sales (April)
US Census Bureau · 10:30 pm AEST
High
What markets look for
Whether manufacturing PMI holds above 50, with the prices paid sub-index giving a read on input cost pressure
Services PMI as a check on the larger share of the US economy, particularly employment and prices
Retail sales control group, which feeds into consumption forecasts
Any sign that sustained Brent crude above US$100 is starting to affect household spending
How this data may move markets
Scenario
Treasuries
USD
Equities
Activity data prints firmer
↑ Yields rise
↑ Firmer
Mixed - depends on valuation stretch
Activity data softens
↓ Yields fall
↓ Softer
Support if inflation cooperates
Labour: payrolls and employment data
The April Employment Situation is one of the most concentrated risk events of the month. March payrolls came in stronger than expected, while earlier data revisions left the trend less clear. April will help show whether the labour market is genuinely re-accelerating or simply absorbing seasonal noise.
Key dates (AEST)
06
May
Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS)
Bureau of Labor Statistics · 12:00 am AEST
Medium
06
May
ADP National Employment Report (April)
ADP Research Institute · 10:15 pm AEST
Medium
08
May
Employment Situation, April (NFP)
Bureau of Labor Statistics · 10:30 pm AEST
High
What markets may watch
Headline non-farm payrolls (NFP) and the size of any prior-month revisions
Average hourly earnings, with energy-driven cost pressure keeping wage growth in focus
Unemployment rate and labour force participation
Sector mix, including whether goods-producing payrolls show signs of disruption
Market sensitivities
Scenario
Treasuries
USD
Equities
Firm NFP/wage growth
↑ Yields rise
↑ Strength
Pressure on valuations
Soft NFP/weak print
↓ Yields fall
↓ Softer
Mixed - risk of growth scare
Inflation: CPI, PPI and PCE
April inflation lands as the most market-relevant data block of the month. The March consumer price index (CPI) rose 3.3% over the prior 12 months, with energy up 10.9% on the month and gasoline up 21.2%, accounting for almost three quarters of the headline increase. With Brent holding near US$105 to US$108 through the latter half of April, a further passthrough into the April CPI energy component looks plausible.
Core CPI and core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) remain the better read on underlying trend.
Key dates (AEST)
12
May
CPI (April)
Bureau of Labor Statistics · 10:30 pm AEST
High
15
May
Producer Price Index (PPI), April
Bureau of Labor Statistics · 10:30 pm AEST
Medium
29
May
Personal Income and Outlays/PCE (April)
Bureau of Economic Analysis · 10:30 pm AEST
High
What markets may watch
Headline CPI year on year, especially the gasoline component
Core CPI, including shelter, services excluding shelter and core goods
PPI as a read on producer-level passthrough from energy and tariffs
Core PCE, which remains the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge
Market sensitivities
Scenario
Treasuries
USD
Commodities
Inflation cools/surprises lower
↓ Yields fall
↓ Softer
Gold consolidation
Headline runs hot/core sticky
↑ Yields rise
↑ Strength
Gold supported on stagflation risk
Policy, trade and earnings
May has no FOMC meeting, so policy attention shifts to Fed speakers, the path of any leadership transition, and the dominant geopolitical backdrop. Chair Jerome Powell's term concludes around the middle of the month. President Donald Trump has nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair, with the Senate Banking Committee having held a confirmation hearing.
The Iran conflict, now in its ninth week, remains the single largest source of macro tail risk, with the Strait of Hormuz blockade and stalled US-Iran talks setting the tone for energy markets and broader risk appetite. Q1 earnings season is in its peak weeks, with peak weeks expected between 27 April and 15 May, and 7 May the most active reporting day.
What to monitor this month
Iran-US negotiations and the operational status of the Strait of Hormuz
Fed speakers and any change in tone between meetings
Q1 earnings, especially from retail, energy and cyclical names
Weekly EIA crude inventories
Any tariff-related announcements that may affect inflation expectations
Bottom line
May is not a quiet month just because there is no FOMC meeting. Payrolls, CPI, PPI, retail sales and PCE all land before the June policy decision, while oil remains the dominant external shock.
For markets, the key question is whether the data points to a temporary energy-driven inflation lift, or a broader inflation problem arriving at the same time as softer growth. That distinction may shape the next major move in bonds, the US dollar, gold and equity indices.
Asia-Pacific markets start May with a more complicated macro backdrop than earlier in 2026. Regional growth has shown resilience, but higher energy prices are testing inflation expectations, trade balances and policy flexibility across fuel-importing economies.
For traders, the month's focus is likely to sit across three linked areas.
China Focus
Activity data
April CPI, PPI and purchasing managers' index (PMI)
Japan Focus
BOJ signals
Corporate goods prices and April CPI
Australia Focus
RBA decision
Statement on Monetary Policy and April CPI
Main Regional Risk
Energy volatility
Trade-sensitive sentiment
China
China remains central to the May Asia-Pacific market drivers outlook because its data can influence commodity demand, regional equities and the Australian dollar. The April data round may help traders assess whether the early-year recovery is broadening or still reliant on production, exports and policy support.
Key Dates (AEST)
30
Apr
Official PMI
National Bureau of Statistics · 11:30 am AEST
Medium
11
May
CPI and industrial producer price index (PPI)
National Bureau of Statistics · 11:30 am AEST
High
18
May
April activity data
Industrial production, retail and property · 12:00 pm AEST
High
27
May
Industrial economic benefits
National Bureau of Statistics · 11:30 am AEST
Medium
What markets may look for
Whether CPI data suggest demand-led inflation or continued subdued household pricing power
Whether PPI data point to improving factory margins or cost pressure from energy and raw materials
Whether retail sales show a firmer household sector or continued reliance on production and exports
Whether property data continue to weigh on confidence, construction demand and local government revenue
Why China matters for the region
China data can influence sentiment toward Asian equities, iron ore, copper, energy markets and the Australian dollar. Stronger domestic demand may support commodity-linked sentiment, while softer retail or property figures may keep markets focused on policy support and downside growth risks.
Japan inflation and BOJ signals
Japan's May calendar is less about a fresh BOJ rate decision and more about how markets interpret the April policy meeting, inflation data and wage-sensitive price trends. That matters because Japanese government bond yields and the yen remain sensitive to any shift in policy normalisation expectations.
Key Dates (AEST)
07
May
Minutes of the March BOJ meeting
Bank of Japan · 8:50 am AEST
Medium
12
May
Summary of Opinions – April BOJ meeting
Most market-sensitive Japan event · 9:50 am AEST
High
15
May
Corporate goods price index
Tracks input cost inflation · 9:50 am AEST
Medium
22
May
National April CPI
Statistics Bureau · 9:30 am AEST
High
29
May
Tokyo May CPI
Leading indicator for national trends · 9:30 am AEST
High
What markets may look for
Whether the BOJ still sees conditions for gradual policy normalisation, or whether energy-driven inflation complicates the outlook.
Whether goods and services inflation remain consistent with the 2% inflation objective.
Whether corporate goods prices reflect energy cost pass-through into producer pricing.
Whether Tokyo CPI points to firm or easing near-term price pressure ahead of the June meeting.
Why Japan matters
Japan’s data can influence yen volatility, Japanese government bond yields and the Nikkei 225. A stronger inflation pulse may support expectations for tighter policy over time, but energy-driven inflation can also pressure households and corporate margins. That balance may keep yen and equity reactions data-dependent.
Australia and the RBA decision
Australia has one of the clearest domestic policy events in the region in May. The RBA's Monetary Policy Board meets on 4 and 5 May, with the decision statement and Statement on Monetary Policy due at 2:30 pm AEST on 5 May. The Governor's media conference follows at 3:30 pm AEST.
Key Dates (AEST)
29
Apr
March CPI
Final read before RBA decision · 11:30 am AEST
High
05
May
RBA decision and Statement on Monetary Policy
Key domestic volatility event · 2:30 pm AEST
High
19
May
Minutes of the May RBA meeting
Reserve Bank of Australia · 11:30 am AEST
Medium
27
May
April CPI
First read on energy pass-through · 11:30 am AEST
High
What markets may look for
Whether the RBA gives more weight to inflation persistence or household demand risks in its decision statement.
Whether the Statement on Monetary Policy adjusts inflation, growth or labour market assumptions from the February update.
Whether April CPI confirms or challenges the inflation narrative after the May decision.
Whether labour conditions remain firm enough, with unemployment at 4.3% in March, to keep services inflation in focus.
Why Australia matters
Australia’s May data may influence AUD/USD, ASX 200 rate-sensitive sectors and short-end bond yields. A firmer inflation profile could support expectations for a restrictive RBA stance, while softer activity or household signals may limit how far markets price additional tightening. For index CFDs and forex CFDs, this is the highest-signal domestic event of the month.
Regional swing factors
Energy remains the main cross-market risk for May. Higher oil and gas prices can lift inflation, widen trade gaps and reduce policy space, particularly for economies dependent on imported fuel such as Japan, South Korea and parts of South-East Asia.
Regional themes to watch
ASEAN purchasing managers' index releases may indicate whether manufacturing momentum is broadening or losing speed. The Australian dollar, New Zealand dollar and Asian FX may remain sensitive to China data and global risk appetite. Iron ore and energy prices may influence Australia and China-linked equities. The RBA, BOJ and People's Bank of China face different inflation and growth trade-offs, and energy supply concerns may continue to shape inflation expectations and risk sentiment across the region.
Key watchlist
01
Top China Data Point
18 May activity data, particularly retail sales and property indicators
02
Top Japan Event
12 May BOJ Summary of Opinions from the April meeting
03
Top Australia Event
5 May RBA decision and Statement on Monetary Policy
04
Main Regional Wildcard
Energy price volatility linked to Middle East developments
05
Most Sensitive Market
AUD/USD, given its link to China demand and RBA repricing risk
06
Key Condition Shift
Evidence that inflation pressure is becoming persistent rather than mainly energy-led
Bottom Line
May’s Asia-Pacific calendar gives markets several points to reassess the region’s inflation, growth and policy mix. China data may shape commodity and risk sentiment, while Japan’s inflation signals and the RBA decision will guide rate pricing.
Energy remains the primary regional risk. If inflation pressure appears more persistent rather than energy-led, markets will become increasingly sensitive to central bank communication and yield repricing.
ASIA SESSION IN FOCUS
Watching Asia-Pacific moves today?
Track Asia-Pacific themes and monitor moves as they unfold.
As we enter May 2026, the global FX market is attempting a difficult high-wire act. April was defined by "civilisation-ending" ultimatums and a Pakistani-brokered ceasefire that sent Brent crude on a rollercoaster from US$110 down to the mid-US$90s.
For traders, the connect-the-dots moment is this: the peak panic around the Iran conflict has faded, but it has been replaced by a structural regime shift. Markets may be moving from a war premium to a transition premium.
With Kevin Warsh nominated to take the Fed chair in mid-May and the Bank of Japan (BOJ) staring down a generational ceiling near 160.00, the calm in the headlines may be masking a major repricing of global yield differentials.
DXY context
Holding near 100.00 on the “Warsh hawk” floor
Strongest currency
USD, supported by safe-haven demand and yield advantage
Weakest currency
JPY, pressured by the rate gap and energy import exposure
Main central bank theme
The hawkish hold and Fed leadership transition
Main catalyst ahead
RBA (5 May) and US Non-Farm Payrolls (8 May)
Monthly leaderboard — biggest movers
01USD
Rose sharply on safe-haven demand and higher for longer yield expectations.
Strongest
02CHF
Advanced strongly as the preferred European refuge from Middle East risk.
Safe Haven
03AUD
Mixed; caught between domestic energy inflation and a hawkish RBA.
Mixed
04NZD
Under pressure; yield gap and capital outflows remains the primary narrative.
Down
05JPY
Fell to 20-month lows; pressured by the widening rate gap and energy import costs.
Weakest
Strongest mover: US dollar (USD)
The US dollar enters May with a new kind of ballast. While the ceasefire reduced the immediate need for a panic hedge, the nomination of Kevin Warsh, widely viewed as an inflation hawk, has provided a structural floor for the greenback.
Markets may be front-running a shift in Fed independence alongside a stricter approach to inflation targeting. That combination - a credible hawkish signal at the policy level - tends to support the dollar even when the near-term data is mixed.
Key drivers
The Warsh effect:
Markets may be front-running a shift in Fed independence and a stricter approach to inflation targeting.
Energy insulation:
As a net exporter, the US may be better cushioned against any fragile ceasefire-related flare-ups in oil than Europe or Japan.
Yield floor:
The federal funds rate at 3.50% to 3.75% remains a potential magnet for global capital.
What markets are watching next
Traders are watching the 101 level on the DXY. A sustained break above this high-volume area could signal a restart of the primary uptrend and a softer-than-expected US non-farm payrolls report on 8 May may challenge that view.
Weakest mover: Japanese yen (JPY)
If you wanted to design a currency to struggle in 2026, the yen fits the brief. Despite the "TACO" script, short for "Trump always chickens out", providing some relief to equities, the mathematical pressure on JPY remains significant.
The BOJ continues its delicate exit from long-term stimulus, but this process has been slower than many anticipated. The USD/JPY pair remains particularly sensitive to US Treasury yields. A move above 4.5% on the US 10-year could put additional pressure on the BOJ to act.
Key drivers
The yield chasm:
Even if the BOJ hikes to 1.00%, the spread against the US dollar would remain around 275 basis points (bps), which may keep the carry trade attractive.
Import vulnerability:
Japan’s heavy reliance on Middle East oil means energy costs may continue to weigh on its current account, even with oil near US$93.
Intervention fatigue:
Finance Minister Katayama has warned of “bold action”, but past interventions in 2022 and 2024 have tended to provide only short-lived relief.
Strategic outlook
USD/JPY is sitting near 159.80. The generational ceiling around 160.40, reportedly not breached in 35 years, remains the key battleground.
The pair to watch: AUD/USD
The Australian dollar sits at an interesting intersection.
Inflation in Australia has proven more persistent than in other developed economies, which may encourage the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) to maintain a cautious, higher-for-longer stance. This could create potential yield support for the AUD that does not exist in the same way for currencies where central banks are already cutting.
What could support the AUD
At the same time, the AUD remains deeply exposed to commodity markets and Chinese demand.
Iron ore and copper are critical inputs for the Australian economy. If global demand remains stable, the Australian dollar could find further support. Any shift in Chinese industrial data will be a key signal for this pair.
The EUR/USD comparison
The EUR/USD dynamic also warrants attention.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is balancing a cooling economy with regional inflation targets. Growth in Germany remains a concern for the eurozone, and markets are pricing in a potential rate cut that could narrow the interest rate differential with the US.
That shift may cause the euro to soften relative to the US dollar. Political developments within the European Union, particularly any fiscal disagreement, could add to volatility in that pair.
Data to watch next
Four events stand out as the clearest catalysts. Each has a direct transmission channel into rate expectations and, by extension, into forex CFDs.
Key dates and FX sensitivity
05
May
RBA Policy Decision
AUD pairs, ASX 200 · 02.30 pm AEST
Markets are pricing a 74% chance of a hike to 4.35% as domestic inflation remains persistent. The outcome may shape AUD direction over the following weeks.
08
May
US Labour Market (NFP)
USD pairs, Gold · 10:30 pm AEST
A second consecutive miss could create an uncomfortable narrative for the new Fed leadership transition. The NFP report provides the clearest picture of US labour market health.
12
May
US consumer price index (CPI), April
USD/JPY, EUR/USD · 10:30 pm AEST
The first clear read on whether the April oil price spike has flowed into core services and sticky inflation. It may influence the Fed’s tone for the remainder of the quarter.
20
May
NVIDIA Q1 Earnings
US Tech, AI Infrastructure · Morning AEST
A key pulse check for the AI infrastructure “invoice phase” and broader risk-on sentiment. It may influence risk-correlated currencies, including AUD and NZD.
Key levels and signals
◆
USD/JPY 160.00
A possible line in the sand for Ministry of Finance intervention. Actual or threatened action here has historically produced sharp reversals in the pair.
◆
AUD/USD 0.7000
A psychological handle that acted as a heavy pivot during the 2025 trade war; remains a near-term directional reference for positioning.
◆
Brent crude US$92.13
Technical resistance where a break lower could confirm the geopolitical floor has weakened, potentially easing pressure on importers.
◆
US 10-year yield 4.5%
A break above this level could create significant valuation pressure for growth-linked FX pairs and emerging market assets.
Bottom line
The FX moves heading into May are being shaped by a normalisation trap. Traders may be betting that the worst of the energy shock is over but a hawkish Fed leadership transition could still re-steepen the yield curve.
Moves are likely to remain highly data-dependent and sensitive to overnight gaps from the Middle East, where geopolitical shifts can gap markets before the next session opens.
The FX market heading into May is being shaped by a normalisation trap. Traders may be betting that the worst of the energy shock is over, but a hawkish Fed leadership transition could still re-steepen the yield curve. Moves are likely to remain highly data-dependent and sensitive to overnight gaps from the Middle East, where geopolitical shifts can gap markets before the next session opens.
Asia-Pacific Coverage
Follow FX through the Asia session
Stay close to Asia-Pacific themes, regional data, sentiment and key crosses.