Investors globally and domestically are stuck in this weird holding pattern. We are all clearly waiting for more definitive signals on the direction of tariffs and broader policy settings, and despite US-China trade talks, we would argue this is news for news' sake – it is not fact. This uncertainty is casting a long shadow over the market, but you wouldn’t know it; the recent volatility has all but reversed equity losses.Beneath the surface, several important trends are shaping the outlook, particularly around the movement of prices for both commodities and consumer goods. For example, look at how local retailers respond with their own pricing strategies to deal with the ‘new trade order’. At the same time, expectations around index rebalancing are adding another layer of complexity, with market participants closely watching which companies might move in or out of major indices in the coming months as geopolitics and the digital age move weightings around.Investors are acutely aware that the next major move will likely be dictated by policy announcements, which could come at any moment and in any form, and so are scrutinising every development for clues.First - In this environment, we are very mindful of oil, any second-order effects that lower oil prices as a traded commodity and at the petrol pump, could have on the broader economy for Australia and, by extension, our China-linked economy. A deal between the US and China, but also Russia and Ukraine, would be huge for oil.Second, there is also an ongoing debate about whether the Australian economy and local equity markets will see any real benefit from a period of goods disinflation, or whether the impact will be more limited than some expect.Looking ahead to the June 2025 index review, expectations are that the level of change will be more subdued compared to what was seen in March. The most significant adjustment on the horizon is the likely addition of REA Group to the S&P/ASX 50 Index, replacing Pilbara Metals. Beyond that, Viva Energy is currently positioned within the 100–200 range and could move up if conditions are right, while Nick Scali is well placed to enter the 200 should a spot become available, and in a rate-cutting environment, consumer discretionary is going to be interesting. The June rebalance is due to be announced on June 6 and implemented on June 20, so there’s plenty of anticipation building as investors position themselves ahead of these changes.Zooming out to the macroeconomic front, several catalysts are likely to shape the market narrative in the weeks ahead.Consumer and business sentiment, first-quarter wage growth, and the April labour force data are all in sharp focus this week and next. The expectation is that consumer sentiment will have continued to decline in May, extending the broader deterioration that’s been in place since the US tariff announcements. Business surveys for April show that both confidence and conditions are holding steady, tracking above their long-run averages.Turning to Wednesdays, Wage index growth is expected to have accelerated in the first quarter, with forecasts pointing to a 0.8% increase quarter-on-quarter and a 3.9% rise year-on-year. This acceleration is being driven by a combination of ongoing tightness in the labour market, stronger enterprise bargaining agreements, and legislated increases in childcare wages.Thursday’s labour force data for April is expected to show 40,000 jobs added, with the unemployment rate holding steady at 4.1%. A slight uptick in participation to 66.9% is also anticipated, reflecting the ongoing strength of the jobs market.In the housing sector, the latest data is less encouraging. Building approvals fell by 8.8% in March, with a 13.4% drop in house approvals. These figures are weaker than both market and consensus expectations, and the annualised rate has now fallen to 160,000. This points to ongoing challenges in the construction sector and raises questions about the sustainability of the housing market recovery. This will bring the RBA and the newly elected Federal government into sharp focus – action is needed, but what that looks like is hard to define.Commodities markets have also seen significant movement, with oil prices dropping below US$60 per barrel, the lowest point since early 2021. This has brought OPEC into sharp focus. The crux question is whether OPEC will attempt to chase prices lower or instead move to stabilise the market. So far, they have pushed prices with deliberate oversupply to punish certain nations – this, however, is unsustainable and will have to change soonCouple this with weaker demand from Asia, and a volatile US dollar is also playing a role, with Brent crude now trading at $55 per barrel. These developments are feeding into broader concerns about global growth and the outlook for commodity exporters.Looking at the local currency and AUD has shown remarkable resilience, supported by a meaningful improvement in the country’s energy trade balance and a weaker US dollar. However, the next major test for the currency will come with the release of the US CPI data on Wednesday, which could set the tone for global markets in the near term – is the Fed out of the market in 2025? This will impact the USD.Looking at the globe, the market and financial landscape is still navigating a complex web of challenges, with persistent inflation, potential tariff implementations, and evolving economic dynamics all in play.Market participants are increasingly focused on how these factors interact and influence everything from consumer pricing to investment strategies. Central bank decisions, especially from the Federal Reserve, have been pivotal in moderating market sentiment, while ongoing discussions about trade policy continue to reshape the global economic environment. Tariffs, in particular, are forcing companies to rethink their supply chains. You only must look at the US reporting season and the likes of Ford, GM, Nike and the like, all scrapping forward guidance and highlighting the impact tariffs are having on cost. The second event that is now becoming ‘actual is that the higher input costs are often now being passed on to consumers. The broader issue here is that this can reduce household disposable income and slow broader economic growth.So, although the excitement of early April has subsided, it's only a social media release away. That means that we as investors are navigating a period of heightened uncertainty, with every policy announcement, economic data release, and market move being scrutinised harder than normal as we look for what it might signal about the path ahead.The interplay between inflation, tariffs, and shifting economic dynamics means that flexibility and vigilance will be essential for anyone looking to make sense of the current environment and position themselves for what comes next.
For most of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, the market has treated Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) as the toll road everyone had to use. Nvidia, Apple, AMD, Broadcom and many major AI chip players relied on its manufacturing capacity.
Now that story is getting more complicated.
Intel reportedly jumped more than 11% on Monday, 8 June 2026, after reports that Google had placed an order for more than 3 million custom tensor processing units (TPUs) with Intel Foundry for delivery from 2028.
That does not make Intel the new TSMC. It does suggest the market is asking a sharper question: what happens when the AI boom starts running into capacity limits?
Here’s the setup
Demand for leading-edge wafers and advanced packaging has grown faster than the supply chain can comfortably absorb. That pressure is now forcing major AI customers to consider alternatives, not necessarily because they are abandoning TSMC, but because they may need more than one route to production.
One answer that emerged on Monday was Intel.
Google has reportedly placed an order with Intel to manufacture more than three million in-house tensor processing units in 2028. Nvidia is also reportedly evaluating Intel’s advanced packaging and 18A process for future chips, according to The Information, which cited people with direct knowledge of the talks.
Why Intel moved
Intel shares rose roughly 11% on Monday, closing at US$110.27. The move added to a sharp 2026 rally and signalled that investors may be reassessing Intel’s role in the AI supply chain.
Explore the architectural landscape of Asian tech giants outside major US infrastructure, tracing which foundry components and supply layers are positioned to optimize massive market cash flows.
Why packaging is the bottleneck
To understand why Monday's news mattered so much, it helps to understand one often-overlooked part of chipmaking: advanced packaging.
Building an AI chip is not just about making the chip itself. Manufacturers also need to connect the processor, memory and other components together so they can work as a single system. That final assembly step is known as advanced packaging.
TSMC dominates one of the most important packaging technologies, called CoWoS (Chip on Wafer on Substrate). The challenge is that demand for CoWoS has surged alongside the AI boom.
Nvidia alone is expected to account for about 60% of global CoWoS demand in 2026, while Broadcom and AMD are expected to take another 26%. That leaves relatively little capacity available for smaller AI chip developers and custom chip makers.
In simple terms, demand for AI chips is growing so quickly that one of the industry's key manufacturing steps is becoming a bottleneck.
Where Intel may fit
Intel has been developing its own alternative packaging technology, called EMIB, or Embedded Multi-die Interconnect Bridge. The technical details are complex, but the market point is simple: Intel believes EMIB can support large AI chip designs and may become an alternative to TSMC’s CoWoS for some workloads.
Intel’s EMIB has reportedly gained traction at Google and Meta, with production yields said to reach around 90%. Yield refers to the percentage of chips that come off the production line working properly. Higher yields generally mean lower costs and more reliable manufacturing.
The geopolitical angle also matters. Some chips made at TSMC’s Arizona facility may still need advanced packaging in Taiwan before final delivery. That weakens the idea of a fully onshore supply chain and helps explain why US-based packaging capacity is getting more attention.
Dies etched at TSMC facility in Arizona, USA.
Partly completed chips shipped over the Pacific.
Advanced packaging applied back in Taiwan.
Finished hardware distributed to end markets.
A granular evaluation of proprietary cloud computing modules vs decentralized hardware footprints, defining the margin advantages and scalability metrics shaping sovereign tech shifts.
Why the market cares
The Intel story is not just about one company winning a contract. It is a signal about where the AI supply chain may be heading.
When Google, one of TSMC’s key customers, reportedly tests a competitor’s packaging technology and then places a multi-million-unit order, the market hears several things at once: TSMC’s capacity constraints may be pushing customers toward alternatives, Intel’s technology may be gaining credibility, and the old “Intel is too far behind to matter” narrative may need updating.
Intel has gained approximately 422% over the past 12 months, an unusually large move for a large-cap semiconductor stock. For traders, the transmission effect is broader than Intel alone. A stronger Intel foundry story may attract capital into US semiconductor names and create a relative value debate between Intel and TSMC, not because TSMC is in trouble, but because its near-monopoly premium is being reassessed.
Assets and names to watch
A structural shift in foundry dynamics ripples outward across key technology components. Monitor this streamlined breakdown to scan positioning profiles.
| Name | Why it matters | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | US foundry challenger. The reported Google TPU order and Nvidia trials support the second-source story, but foundry losses and execution risk remain the key limits. | Google order final confirmation, 18A process yields, structural foundry unit losses. |
| TSMC | Still the dominant global foundry. The risk is not immediate share loss, but that capacity limits create space for alternatives to gain relevance. | CoWoS advanced packaging expansion timelines, gross margins, key customer retention. |
| NVIDIA | The demand engine behind much of the AI supply chain pressure. Its Intel trials matter, but testing does not equal a production shift. | Whether multi-project wafer trials translate into high-volume commercial production orders. |
| SMH ETF | Broad semiconductor exposure through a basket containing TSMC, NVIDIA and Intel. | Useful for tracking whether the story is stock-specific or sector-wide. |
Bull case, cautionary case and what could go wrong
The supportive case for Intel is easy to understand. AI demand remains strong, TSMC capacity stays tight and major customers are looking for credible second-source manufacturing options. If Intel can turn reported trials and early customer interest into commercial production, the market may continue to treat its foundry strategy as more credible.
But this is still a conditional story, not a completed turnaround.
Intel’s foundry unit posted an operating loss of approximately US$10.3 billion in fiscal 2025, while the stock has already rallied about 175% year to date (YTD). That leaves less room for disappointment if future updates fall short.
The biggest technical test is 18A. Intel needs its manufacturing process to reach yields that commercial customers can rely on. Yield refers to the share of chips that come out usable. If Q2 disclosures disappoint, confidence in the foundry story could weaken.
Customer confirmation also matters. NVIDIA has not placed a production order with Intel. Reported Feynman architecture trials are still early stage, and testing does not guarantee committed production volume.
TSMC is another constraint on the Intel bull case. It is targeting CoWoS capacity of approximately 130,000 to 140,000 wafers per month by 2026 to 2027. If that expansion catches up with demand, the pressure pushing customers toward alternatives may ease.
There is also the broader AI spending cycle. If hyperscalers such as Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta slow infrastructure spending, the whole semiconductor sector could come under pressure, regardless of Intel’s progress.
The key variables to watch are customer confirmation, 18A yield progress, Intel foundry pipeline updates, TSMC capacity expansion and whether AI infrastructure spending remains strong.
The semiconductor space is no longer just about raw processor speeds, it has become an execution battleground for advanced packaging capacity and global footprint resilience.








