Investors globally and domestically are stuck in this weird holding pattern. We are all clearly waiting for more definitive signals on the direction of tariffs and broader policy settings, and despite US-China trade talks, we would argue this is news for news' sake – it is not fact. This uncertainty is casting a long shadow over the market, but you wouldn’t know it; the recent volatility has all but reversed equity losses.Beneath the surface, several important trends are shaping the outlook, particularly around the movement of prices for both commodities and consumer goods. For example, look at how local retailers respond with their own pricing strategies to deal with the ‘new trade order’. At the same time, expectations around index rebalancing are adding another layer of complexity, with market participants closely watching which companies might move in or out of major indices in the coming months as geopolitics and the digital age move weightings around.Investors are acutely aware that the next major move will likely be dictated by policy announcements, which could come at any moment and in any form, and so are scrutinising every development for clues.First - In this environment, we are very mindful of oil, any second-order effects that lower oil prices as a traded commodity and at the petrol pump, could have on the broader economy for Australia and, by extension, our China-linked economy. A deal between the US and China, but also Russia and Ukraine, would be huge for oil.Second, there is also an ongoing debate about whether the Australian economy and local equity markets will see any real benefit from a period of goods disinflation, or whether the impact will be more limited than some expect.Looking ahead to the June 2025 index review, expectations are that the level of change will be more subdued compared to what was seen in March. The most significant adjustment on the horizon is the likely addition of REA Group to the S&P/ASX 50 Index, replacing Pilbara Metals. Beyond that, Viva Energy is currently positioned within the 100–200 range and could move up if conditions are right, while Nick Scali is well placed to enter the 200 should a spot become available, and in a rate-cutting environment, consumer discretionary is going to be interesting. The June rebalance is due to be announced on June 6 and implemented on June 20, so there’s plenty of anticipation building as investors position themselves ahead of these changes.Zooming out to the macroeconomic front, several catalysts are likely to shape the market narrative in the weeks ahead.Consumer and business sentiment, first-quarter wage growth, and the April labour force data are all in sharp focus this week and next. The expectation is that consumer sentiment will have continued to decline in May, extending the broader deterioration that’s been in place since the US tariff announcements. Business surveys for April show that both confidence and conditions are holding steady, tracking above their long-run averages.Turning to Wednesdays, Wage index growth is expected to have accelerated in the first quarter, with forecasts pointing to a 0.8% increase quarter-on-quarter and a 3.9% rise year-on-year. This acceleration is being driven by a combination of ongoing tightness in the labour market, stronger enterprise bargaining agreements, and legislated increases in childcare wages.Thursday’s labour force data for April is expected to show 40,000 jobs added, with the unemployment rate holding steady at 4.1%. A slight uptick in participation to 66.9% is also anticipated, reflecting the ongoing strength of the jobs market.In the housing sector, the latest data is less encouraging. Building approvals fell by 8.8% in March, with a 13.4% drop in house approvals. These figures are weaker than both market and consensus expectations, and the annualised rate has now fallen to 160,000. This points to ongoing challenges in the construction sector and raises questions about the sustainability of the housing market recovery. This will bring the RBA and the newly elected Federal government into sharp focus – action is needed, but what that looks like is hard to define.Commodities markets have also seen significant movement, with oil prices dropping below US$60 per barrel, the lowest point since early 2021. This has brought OPEC into sharp focus. The crux question is whether OPEC will attempt to chase prices lower or instead move to stabilise the market. So far, they have pushed prices with deliberate oversupply to punish certain nations – this, however, is unsustainable and will have to change soonCouple this with weaker demand from Asia, and a volatile US dollar is also playing a role, with Brent crude now trading at $55 per barrel. These developments are feeding into broader concerns about global growth and the outlook for commodity exporters.Looking at the local currency and AUD has shown remarkable resilience, supported by a meaningful improvement in the country’s energy trade balance and a weaker US dollar. However, the next major test for the currency will come with the release of the US CPI data on Wednesday, which could set the tone for global markets in the near term – is the Fed out of the market in 2025? This will impact the USD.Looking at the globe, the market and financial landscape is still navigating a complex web of challenges, with persistent inflation, potential tariff implementations, and evolving economic dynamics all in play.Market participants are increasingly focused on how these factors interact and influence everything from consumer pricing to investment strategies. Central bank decisions, especially from the Federal Reserve, have been pivotal in moderating market sentiment, while ongoing discussions about trade policy continue to reshape the global economic environment. Tariffs, in particular, are forcing companies to rethink their supply chains. You only must look at the US reporting season and the likes of Ford, GM, Nike and the like, all scrapping forward guidance and highlighting the impact tariffs are having on cost. The second event that is now becoming ‘actual is that the higher input costs are often now being passed on to consumers. The broader issue here is that this can reduce household disposable income and slow broader economic growth.So, although the excitement of early April has subsided, it's only a social media release away. That means that we as investors are navigating a period of heightened uncertainty, with every policy announcement, economic data release, and market move being scrutinised harder than normal as we look for what it might signal about the path ahead.The interplay between inflation, tariffs, and shifting economic dynamics means that flexibility and vigilance will be essential for anyone looking to make sense of the current environment and position themselves for what comes next.
Where did all the excitement go? And where does it leave us?

Related Articles

5 月伊始,联邦基金目标利率区间维持在 3.50% 至 3.75%。美联储刚刚结束了 4 月 28-29 日的议息会议,投资者正进入一个政策真空期,直至 6 月 16-17 日的下一次决议。然而,地缘政治背景远非平静。由于伊朗冲突导致霍尔木兹海峡处于事实上的关闭状态,布伦特原油价格已飙升至每桶 108 美元附近,国际能源署将其描述为“史上最大的能源供应冲击”。
本月的宏观矛盾既直接又令人不安:由能源驱动的通胀脉冲,正撞上 3 月份表现意外强劲的劳动力市场,而第一季度的增长数据却依然疲软。这种带有“滞胀”色彩的组合拳,直接挑战了美联储目前的政策路径。
美联储此前已将 2026 年 PCE 通胀预期上调至 2.7%,并继续暗示年内仅有一次降息,尽管市场对具体的降息时点仍持有异议。由于 5 月没有 FOMC 议息会议,每一项重磅数据的发布都将比往常承载更多的权重,成为投资者博弈 6 月政策走向的关键筹码。
经济增长:业务活动与需求
步入 5 月,经济增长的前景表现不一。第一季度 GDP 初步预览值已于 4 月 30 日公布,而此前疲软的零售销售和库存数据,使得整体需求端的局势变得更加难以捉摸。
ISM 制造业指数一直是乐观情绪的一个低调来源,近期的数值始终维持在扩张区间。然而,逆风的来源正在发生变化:能源成本和关税效应目前是决定业务活动下一步走向的最关键变量。对于那些已经在应对高昂投入成本的企业来说,108 美元的油价与贸易摩擦的结合,将是对企业韧性的一次重大考验。
劳动力:非农与就业数据
4 月的就业形势报告是本月最集中的风险事件之一。尽管 3 月非农数据强于预期,但此前的修正值使得整体趋势显得有些模糊。4 月的数据将起到决定性作用:揭示劳动力市场是在高利率背景下真正实现了“再加速”,还是仅仅在消化季节性噪音。
通胀:CPI、PPI 与 PCE
4 月的通胀数据是本月对市场影响最大的板块。3 月消费者价格指数 (CPI) 同比上涨 3.3%,其中能源成本月度上涨 10.9%,汽油价格飙升 21.2%,贡献了整体涨幅的近四分之三。鉴于布伦特原油在 4 月下旬维持在 105 至 108 美元之间,能源成本进一步传导至 4 月 CPI 几乎已成定局。尽管整体通胀数据引人注目,但核心 CPI 和核心 PCE 依然是研判美联储底层通胀趋势的关键指标。
政策、贸易与企业盈利
由于 5 月没有 FOMC 议息会议,政策关注点将转向美联储官员的讲话以及备受瞩目的领导层更迭。美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的任期将于本月中旬结束。唐纳德·特朗普总统已提名 凯文·沃什 (Kevin Warsh) 为下一任主席,市场正密切分析其听证会内容,以寻找央行独立性或政策倾向是否会发生转向的蛛丝马迹。
在地缘政治方面,已进入第九周的伊朗冲突仍是最大的宏观尾部风险。霍尔木兹海峡的封锁和停滞不前的美伊谈判为能源价格设定了较高的底部支撑。同时,第一季度财报季进入高峰期,预计 5 月 7 日将是报表发布最密集的一天,市场将重点关注零售和周期性行业如何应对利润率的挤压。
本月核心监控清单
- 美伊谈判: 关注霍尔木兹海峡运行状态的任何进展。
- 美联储语调: 官员在会议间隙期辞令的任何细微转变。
- 盈利质量: 尤其是零售、能源及周期性行业的表现。
- EIA 原油库存: 通过周度数据衡量国内供应缓冲情况。
- 关税公告: 任何可能推高通胀预期的贸易摩擦信号。
核心总结 (Bottom Line)
绝不能因为 5 月没有议息会议就认为这是一个平淡的月份。在 6 月决议之前,非农、CPI、PPI 和 PCE 数据将悉数出炉,而原油依然是主要的外源性冲击。对于市场而言,核心问题在于:我们面对的是一次暂时的能源驱动型通胀上升,还是在增长放缓的同时出现了一个更广泛的系统性通胀问题?这一区别将决定债券、美元、黄金及股指的下一个大级别走势。

f2026 年 5 月伊始,亚太市场面临的宏观背景比年初更为错综复杂。尽管区域增长展现了韧性,但走高的能源价格正在考验燃料进口型经济体的通胀预期、贸易收支以及政策调控的灵活性。
对于交易者而言,本月的焦点预计将集中在三个相互关联的领域。
中国市场
日本:央行的平衡木之舞
澳大利亚与澳洲联储
亚太区域波动因素

Here is the situation as April begins. A war is affecting one of the world's most important oil chokepoints. Brent crude is trading above US$100. And the Federal Reserve (Fed), which spent much of 2025 engineering a soft landing, is now facing an inflation threat driven less by wages, services or the domestic economy, and more by energy. It is watching an oil shock.
The Fed funds rate sits at 3.50% to 3.75%. The next Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting is on 28 and 29 April and the key question for markets is not whether the Fed will cut, it is whether the Fed can cut, or whether the energy shock may have shut that door for much of 2026.
A heavy run of major data releases lands in April. The March consumer price index (CPI), non-farm payrolls (NFP) and the advance estimate of Q1 gross domestic product (GDP) are the three that matter most. But the FOMC statement on 29 April may be the release that sets the tone for the rest of the year.
Growth: Business activity and demand
Think about what the US economy looked like coming into this year: AI-driven capital expenditure (capex) was a major part of the growth narrative, corporate investment intentions looked firm and the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act was already in the mix. On paper, the growth story looked solid.
Then the Strait of Hormuz situation changed the calculus. Not because the US is a net energy importer, it is not, and that structural insulation matters. But what is good for US energy producers can still squeeze margins elsewhere and weigh on global demand. The 30 April advance Q1 gross domestic product (GDP) estimate is now likely to be read through two lenses: how strong was the economy before the shock, and what it may signal about the quarters ahead.
Labour: Payrolls and employment
February's jobs report was, depending on how you read it, either a blip or a warning sign. Non-farm payrolls (NFP) fell by 92,000, unemployment edged up to 4.4% and the official line was that weather played a role. That may be true but here is what also happened. The labour market suddenly looked a little less convincing as the main argument for keeping rates elevated.
The 3 April employment report for March is now genuinely consequential. A bounce back to positive payroll growth would probably steady nerves and a second consecutive soft print, particularly against a backdrop of higher energy prices, would start to build a very uncomfortable narrative for the Fed. It would be looking at slower jobs growth and an inflation threat at the same time. That is not a comfortable place to be.
Inflation: CPI, PPI and PCE
Here is the uncomfortable truth about where inflation sits right now. Core personal consumption expenditures (PCE), the Fed's preferred gauge, was already running at 3.1% year on year in January, before any oil shock had fed through. The Fed had not fully solved its inflation problem, rather, it had slowed it down. That is a different thing.
And now, on top of a not-quite-solved inflation problem, oil prices have moved sharply higher. Energy prices can feed into the consumer price index (CPI) relatively quickly, through petrol, transport and logistics costs that can eventually show up in the price of nearly everything. The 10 April CPI print for March is probably the most important single data release of the month, it is the one that may tell us whether the energy shock is already showing up in the numbers the Fed watches.
Policy, trade and earnings
April is also the start of US earnings season, and this quarter's results carry an unusual amount of weight. Investors have been pouring capital into AI infrastructure on the basis that returns are coming. The question is when. With geopolitical volatility driving a rotation away from growth-oriented technology and towards energy and defence, JPMorgan Chase's 14 April earnings will be read as much for what management says about the macro environment as for the numbers themselves.
Then there is the FOMC meeting on 28 and 29 April. After the early-April run of data, including NFP, CPI and producer price index (PPI), the Fed will have more than enough information to update its language. Whether it signals that rate cuts could remain on hold through 2026, or whether it leaves the door slightly ajar, may be the most consequential communication of the quarter.
Geopolitical volatility has already pushed investors to reassess growth-heavy positioning. The estimated US$650 billion AI infrastructure buildout is also coming under heavier scrutiny on return on investment. If earnings season disappoints on that front, and if the FOMC signals a prolonged hold, the combination could test risk appetite heading into May.
Big US data release ahead? Stay focused.
Open an account · Log in
Recent Articles

当特朗普政府在 2 月底将全球关税推高至 15%、中东地缘政治风险再次燃起,且凯文·沃什(Kevin Warsh)的美联储主席提名向债市发出鹰派震慑时,黄金表现出了它在压力时期应有的姿态:应声上涨
比特币的表现则截然不同——它紧随纳斯达克的跌势。从 2025 年 10 月超过 126,000 美元 的巅峰起步,到 3 月初已暴跌近 50%,回落至 60,000 美元上方。这种走势的分化才是重点:黄金表现得更像避难所,而比特币则像是一个捆绑了额外杠杆的高贝塔(High-beta)科技股。
对于差价合约(CFD)交易者——即那些通过杠杆博取价差而非持有实物的投资者来说,这种区别并非学术讨论,它直接揭示了当你进入这两个市场时,你交易的本质究竟是什么。
驱动力分析
黄金正同时受到三股力量的推动:全球央行的持续囤积、投资者对冲货币贬值的需求,以及针对关税政策和地缘政治新闻的响应式避险资金流入。
比特币的驱动因素显得更为复杂且充满“噪音”,尤其是考虑到它仍受惠于机构化的渗透、现货 ETF 的支撑,以及那套关于“数字黄金”的长盛不衰的叙事。然而,其短期价格逻辑已日益转向由杠杆水平主导。量化风控柜台(Algorithmic risk desks)如今已将比特币与科技权益类资产划入同一“风险池”。因此,每当华尔街的“恐惧指标” VIX 飙升时,这些交易模型往往会自动触发对比特币敞口的减持。这种抛售是机械化的程序反应,而非投资逻辑层面的根本动摇。
市场为何关注
这正解释了为什么两类通常都被冠以“避险资产”头衔的标的,却可能在同一天呈现出截然相反的走势。
CFD 交易员观察要点
黄金的问题在于,这一轮涨势目前显得有些“力竭”。1 月份那几个交易日内约 14% 的跌幅提醒了我们:拥挤交易 (Crowded trades) 是一把双刃剑,尤其是当杠杆机构需要套现筹措资金,并不得不抛售手中流动性最好的资产时。比特币可能在短短一小时内波动数个百分点,而其原因可能与当早宏观新闻中的叙事毫无关系。而在 CFD 杠杆的加持下,这种波动性会在多空两个方向上被同步放大。
哪些变数可能扭转局面?

5 月伊始,联邦基金目标利率区间维持在 3.50% 至 3.75%。美联储刚刚结束了 4 月 28-29 日的议息会议,投资者正进入一个政策真空期,直至 6 月 16-17 日的下一次决议。然而,地缘政治背景远非平静。由于伊朗冲突导致霍尔木兹海峡处于事实上的关闭状态,布伦特原油价格已飙升至每桶 108 美元附近,国际能源署将其描述为“史上最大的能源供应冲击”。
本月的宏观矛盾既直接又令人不安:由能源驱动的通胀脉冲,正撞上 3 月份表现意外强劲的劳动力市场,而第一季度的增长数据却依然疲软。这种带有“滞胀”色彩的组合拳,直接挑战了美联储目前的政策路径。
美联储此前已将 2026 年 PCE 通胀预期上调至 2.7%,并继续暗示年内仅有一次降息,尽管市场对具体的降息时点仍持有异议。由于 5 月没有 FOMC 议息会议,每一项重磅数据的发布都将比往常承载更多的权重,成为投资者博弈 6 月政策走向的关键筹码。
经济增长:业务活动与需求
步入 5 月,经济增长的前景表现不一。第一季度 GDP 初步预览值已于 4 月 30 日公布,而此前疲软的零售销售和库存数据,使得整体需求端的局势变得更加难以捉摸。
ISM 制造业指数一直是乐观情绪的一个低调来源,近期的数值始终维持在扩张区间。然而,逆风的来源正在发生变化:能源成本和关税效应目前是决定业务活动下一步走向的最关键变量。对于那些已经在应对高昂投入成本的企业来说,108 美元的油价与贸易摩擦的结合,将是对企业韧性的一次重大考验。
劳动力:非农与就业数据
4 月的就业形势报告是本月最集中的风险事件之一。尽管 3 月非农数据强于预期,但此前的修正值使得整体趋势显得有些模糊。4 月的数据将起到决定性作用:揭示劳动力市场是在高利率背景下真正实现了“再加速”,还是仅仅在消化季节性噪音。
通胀:CPI、PPI 与 PCE
4 月的通胀数据是本月对市场影响最大的板块。3 月消费者价格指数 (CPI) 同比上涨 3.3%,其中能源成本月度上涨 10.9%,汽油价格飙升 21.2%,贡献了整体涨幅的近四分之三。鉴于布伦特原油在 4 月下旬维持在 105 至 108 美元之间,能源成本进一步传导至 4 月 CPI 几乎已成定局。尽管整体通胀数据引人注目,但核心 CPI 和核心 PCE 依然是研判美联储底层通胀趋势的关键指标。
政策、贸易与企业盈利
由于 5 月没有 FOMC 议息会议,政策关注点将转向美联储官员的讲话以及备受瞩目的领导层更迭。美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的任期将于本月中旬结束。唐纳德·特朗普总统已提名 凯文·沃什 (Kevin Warsh) 为下一任主席,市场正密切分析其听证会内容,以寻找央行独立性或政策倾向是否会发生转向的蛛丝马迹。
在地缘政治方面,已进入第九周的伊朗冲突仍是最大的宏观尾部风险。霍尔木兹海峡的封锁和停滞不前的美伊谈判为能源价格设定了较高的底部支撑。同时,第一季度财报季进入高峰期,预计 5 月 7 日将是报表发布最密集的一天,市场将重点关注零售和周期性行业如何应对利润率的挤压。
本月核心监控清单
- 美伊谈判: 关注霍尔木兹海峡运行状态的任何进展。
- 美联储语调: 官员在会议间隙期辞令的任何细微转变。
- 盈利质量: 尤其是零售、能源及周期性行业的表现。
- EIA 原油库存: 通过周度数据衡量国内供应缓冲情况。
- 关税公告: 任何可能推高通胀预期的贸易摩擦信号。
核心总结 (Bottom Line)
绝不能因为 5 月没有议息会议就认为这是一个平淡的月份。在 6 月决议之前,非农、CPI、PPI 和 PCE 数据将悉数出炉,而原油依然是主要的外源性冲击。对于市场而言,核心问题在于:我们面对的是一次暂时的能源驱动型通胀上升,还是在增长放缓的同时出现了一个更广泛的系统性通胀问题?这一区别将决定债券、美元、黄金及股指的下一个大级别走势。

f2026 年 5 月伊始,亚太市场面临的宏观背景比年初更为错综复杂。尽管区域增长展现了韧性,但走高的能源价格正在考验燃料进口型经济体的通胀预期、贸易收支以及政策调控的灵活性。
对于交易者而言,本月的焦点预计将集中在三个相互关联的领域。

